Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18951440›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2008

In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods.

Sean V Tavtigian, Marc S Greenblatt, Fabienne Lesueur, Graham B Byrnes, IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comprehensive Identification of DeleteriousInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean V TavtigianInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France. tavtigian@iarc.fr
Marc S Greenblatt
Fabienne Lesueur
Graham B Byrnes
IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL &LABORATORY STUDY OF P16/INK4 MUTATIONSR01CA096536 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI GREENBLATT, MARC S · 2002 to 2004
$739k
COMPUTATIONAL &LABORATORY STUDY OF P16/INK4 MUTATIONSR55CA096536 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI GREENBLATT, MARC S · 2002 to 2002
$50k
NCI NIH HHS CA 96536NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096536NCI NIH HHS R55 CA096536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for mutations in high-risk cancer susceptibility genes often reveals missense substitutions that are not easily classified as pathogenic or neutral. Among the methods that can help in their classification are computational analyses. Predictions of pathogenic vs. neutral, or the probability that a variant is pathogenic, can be made based on: 1) inferences from evolutionary conservation using protein multiple sequence alignments (PMSAs) of the gene of interest for almost any missense sequence variant; and 2) for many variants, structural features of wild-type and variant proteins. These in silico methods have improved considerably in recent years. In this work, we review and/or make suggestions with respect to: 1) the rationale for using in silico methods to help predict the consequences of missense variants; 2) important aspects of creating PMSAs that are informative for classification; 3) specific features of algorithms that have been used for classification of clinically-observed variants; 4) validation studies demonstrating that computational analyses can have predictive values (PVs) of approximately 75 to 95%; 5) current limitations of data sets and algorithms that need to be addressed to improve the computational classifiers; and 6) how in silico algorithms can be a part of the "integrated analysis" of multiple lines of evidence to help classify variants. We conclude that carefully validated computational algorithms, in the context of other evidence, can be an important tool for classification of missense variants.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmMutation, MissenseAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationHumansMolecular Sequence DataNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryPredictive Value of TestsSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID18951440
PMCPMC3431198
OpenAlexW1984576497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.