Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18949456›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2009

Remifentanil-propofol analgo-sedation shortens duration of ventilation and length of ICU stay compared to a conventional regimen: a centre randomised, cross-over, open-label study in the Netherlands.

F Willem Rozendaal, Peter E Spronk, Ferdinand F Snellen, Adri Schoen, Arthur R H van Zanten, Norbert A Foudraine, Paul G H Mulder, Jan Bakker, UltiSAFE investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep Sedation in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

F Willem RozendaalJeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Peter E Spronk
Ferdinand F Snellen
Adri Schoen
Arthur R H van Zanten
Norbert A Foudraine
Paul G H Mulder
Jan Bakker
UltiSAFE investigators
Erasmus MC · NLGelre Hospitals · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NLZiekenhuis Rivierenland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCompare duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), weaning time, ICU-LOS (ICU-LOS), efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen with conventional sedation and analgesia.

designCentre randomised, open-label, crossover, 'real-life' study.

setting15 Dutch hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult medical and post-surgical ICU patients with anticipated short-term (2-3 days) MV.

interventionsPatient cohorts were randomised to remifentanil-based regimen (n = 96) with propofol as required, for a maximum of 10 days, or to conventional regimens (n = 109) of propofol, midazolam or lorazepam combined with fentanyl or morphine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOutcomes were weaning time, duration of MV, ICU-LOS, sedation- and analgesia levels, intensivist/ICU nurse satisfaction, adverse events, mean arterial pressure, heart rate. Median duration of ventilation (MV) was 5.1 days with conventional treatment versus 3.9 days with remifentanil (NS). The remifentanil-based regimen reduced median weaning time by 18.9 h (P = 0.0001). Median ICU-LOS was 7.9 days versus 5.9 days, respectively (NS). However, the treatment effects on duration of MV and ICU stay were time-dependent: patients were almost twice as likely to be extubated (P = 0.018) and discharged from the ICU (P = 0.05) on day 1-3. Propofol doses were reduced by 20% (P = 0.05). Remifentanil also improved sedation-agitation scores (P < 0.0001) and intensivist/ICU nurse satisfaction (P < 0.0001). All other outcomes were comparable.

conclusionsIn patients with an expected short-term duration of MV, remifentanil significantly improves sedation and agitation levels and reduces weaning time. This contributes to a shorter duration of MV and ICU-LOS.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPiperidinesPropofolPsychomotor AgitationRemifentanilRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory InsufficiencyVentilator WeaningHypnotics and SedativesPiperidinesPropofolRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID18949456
OpenAlexW2108341058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.