Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18949022›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2008

Organization of physical interactomes as uncovered by network schemas.

Eric Banks, Elena Nabieva, Bernard Chazelle, Mona Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational solutions for omics data.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward the dynamic interactome: it's about time.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The capabilities of chaos and complexity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2009
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric BanksDepartment of Computer Science & Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Elena Nabieva
Bernard Chazelle
Mona Singh

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BOTSTEIN, DAVID · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Quantitavie and Computational Biology Graduate ProgramT32HG003284 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua Michael Akey, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman · 2004 to 2026
$9.9M
VIRAL AND CELLULAR ONCOGENES--MECHANISM OF ACTIONP01CA041086 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WIESCHAUS, ERIC F · 1986 to 2005
$9.4M
Predicting and analyzing variation in cellular interactomesR01GM076275 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SINGH, MONA · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA041086NCI NIH HHS P01 CA041086NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG003284NIGMS NIH HHS GM076275NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale protein-protein interaction networks provide new opportunities for understanding cellular organization and functioning. We introduce network schemas to elucidate shared mechanisms within interactomes. Network schemas specify descriptions of proteins and the topology of interactions among them. We develop algorithms for systematically uncovering recurring, over-represented schemas in physical interaction networks. We apply our methods to the S. cerevisiae interactome, focusing on schemas consisting of proteins described via sequence motifs and molecular function annotations and interacting with one another in one of four basic network topologies. We identify hundreds of recurring and over-represented network schemas of various complexity, and demonstrate via graph-theoretic representations how more complex schemas are organized in terms of their lower-order constituents. The uncovered schemas span a wide range of cellular activities, with many signaling and transport related higher-order schemas. We establish the functional importance of the schemas by showing that they correspond to functionally cohesive sets of proteins, are enriched in the frequency with which they have instances in the H. sapiens interactome, and are useful for predicting protein function. Our findings suggest that network schemas are a powerful paradigm for organizing, interrogating, and annotating cellular networks.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarrier ProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCarrier ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18949022
PMCPMC2561054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.