ReviewMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2008
The role of theoretical modeling in microcirculation research.
Review in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood Flow Simulation and Uncertainty Quantification in Extensive Microvascular Networks: Application to Brain Cortical Networks.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Microvascular Tissue Engineering-A Review.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Modeling the hematocrit distribution in microcirculatory networks: A quantitative evaluation of a phase separation model.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2018Article
- Physiological models of the lateral superior olive.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Model-based inference from microvascular measurements: Combining experimental measurements and model predictions using a Bayesian probabilistic approach.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2017Article
- Making microvascular networks work: angiogenesis, remodeling, and pruning.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2014Review
- Capillary recruitment in a theoretical model for blood flow regulation in heterogeneous microvessel networks.Physiological reports · 2013Article
- Oxygen transport in the microcirculation and its regulation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2013Review
- Study of tumor growth under hyperthermia condition.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012Article
- The microcirculation: physiology at the mesoscale.The Journal of physiology · 2011Review
- Modeling of angioadaptation: insights for vascular development.The International journal of developmental biology · 2011Review
- Cerebral blood flow modeling in primate cortex.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2010Article
- Microcirculation and the physiome projects.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theoretical modeling approaches have made important contributions to research in the biological sciences, including the microcirculation, and their value is increasingly recognized. However, misconceptions about the nature and role of theoretical models persist, and such work is often presented in a way that does not maximize its value, especially for scientists who are not themselves using such models. In this review, a categorization of models as phenomenological, qualitative conceptual, quantitative conceptual, or predictive is proposed, and the characteristics of each type are discussed. Recommendations are made for the presentation of models and for the future development of modeling approaches. The concepts discussed are generally applicable to the theoretical modeling of biological systems and are illustrated by using examples of modeling in microcirculation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.