Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18946751›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2008

Novel therapeutic strategy for uterine endometrial cancers.

Jiro Fujimoto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiro FujimotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Gifu University School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. jf@gifu-u.ac.jp
Gifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, tumors induce angiogenic factors specific to them, which leads to angiogenesis with tumor progression. However, angiogenesis in uterine endometrial cancers is complicated because the hormone dependency in their growth also modifies the angiogenic potential. Therefore, angiogenic potential in uterine endometrial cancers must be thoroughly analyzed. The upstream of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene conserves estrogen-responsive elements. Progesterone primed with estrogen induces thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in the uterine endometrium. Sex steroid-dependent VEGF and TP are highly expressed in early-stage and well-differentiated uterine endometrial cancers, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is highly expressed in advanced and poorly differentiated uterine endometrial cancers. A transcriptional factor for angiogenesis, E26 transformation specific (ETS-1), is linked to VEGF in well-differentiated uterine endometrial cancers, and to bFGF in poorly differentiated uterine endometrial cancers. Therefore, even if dedifferentiation and angiogenic switching occur due to tumor progression and long-term hormone therapy, the inhibition of ETS-1, along with inhibition of the main angiogenic factors, may be an effective strategy to suppress uterine endometrial cancers as a novel antiangiogenic therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeovascularization, PathologicProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1

Identifiers

PMID18946751
OpenAlexW2011508462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.