Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18946643›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2008

[Reality of treatment of osteoporotic fractures in German trauma departments. A contribution for outcome research].

T Vogel, P Kampmann, D Bürklein, H Böhm, B Ockert, C Kirchhoff, K G Kanz, K J Pfeifer, W Mutschler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

T VogelKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Deutschland. t.vogel@klinikum-bochum.de
P Kampmann
D Bürklein
H Böhm
B Ockert
C Kirchhoff
K G Kanz
K J Pfeifer
W Mutschler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of clinical pathways has a proven positive effect on the diagnostic workup and initiation of therapy in osteoporotic fracture patients. Unlike in most countries, fracture care in Germany is provided by so-called trauma surgeons. Therefore, it is essential to focus on the trauma surgeon for correct diagnostic workup and therapy initiation after a fragility fracture. A questionnaire was mailed to 409 departments of traumatology inquiring about the existence of a standardized clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment of patients with fragility fractures. One of the central issues of the survey was whether those pathways comply with national guidelines. Only institutions that stated that they followed a clinical pathway were analyzed. 80% of institutions took part in our survey, 35% of which reported following a defined clinical pathway. Diagnostic workup is in concordance with the national guidelines in 30%, and therapy is guideline-based in 51%, with 12% basing both diagnostic workup and therapy on the guidelines. Thus, the vast majority of German traumatology departments do not follow national guidelines regarding osteoporosis diagnostics and therapy in patients with fragility fractures, leading to a great opportunity to improve fragility fracture care by means of both education and interdisciplinary cooperation.

Indexed as

ComorbidityFractures, SpontaneousGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansOsteoporosisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'TraumatologyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.