Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2009
Efficacy of exercise, losartan, enalapril, atenolol and rilmenidine in subjects with blood pressure hyperreactivity at treadmill stress test and left ventricular hypertrophy.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High levels of activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) are related to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A percentage of subjects with hyperactivity to treadmill stress test show LVH to echocardiogram. This paper aims at evaluating neurohumoral influence over these subjects by comparing drugs that block both the RAS and the SNS. In a 1-year open protocol, 195 normotensive subjects, with hyperactivity to treadmill stress test and LVH, were randomly assigned to supervised physical exercise, rilmenidine 1 mg day(-1), atenolol 50 mg day(-1), enalapril 10 mg day(-1) or losartan 50 mg day(-1). Changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMI), measured by means of echocardiogram, were the primary end point. Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at rest and peak effort were also evaluated. Enalapril significantly brought LVMI down in relation to the basal value (28.2%; n=36) similarly to losartan (26.9%; n=42); P>0.05. However, both were more efficient than physical exercise (2.9%; n=39), rilmenidine (5.1%; n=38) and atenolol (7.2%; n=40); P<0.001. There was no significant difference in SBP reduction at rest and peak effort in groups assigned to atenolol, enalapril and losartan; P>0.05. In such groups, reduction was greater than in groups assigned to physical exercise and rimenidine; P<0.001. In conclusion, drugs that block RAS were more efficient in reducing LVH than physical exercise and drugs that block SNS, and such reduction took place regardless of SBP level reduction at rest and peak effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.