ReviewJournal of dental research2008
Tools for interpreting large-scale protein profiling in microbiology.
Review in Journal of dental research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viscoelastic Properties of Human Facial Skin and Comparisons with Facial Prosthetic Elastomers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Proteomic profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis identifies nutrient-starvation-responsive toxin-antitoxin systems.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013Article
- The representation of heart development in the gene ontology.Developmental biology · 2011Article
- Cellular and bacterial profiles associated with oral epithelium-microbiota interactions.Periodontology 2000 · 2010Review
- Emerging vaccine informatics.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Review
- Adaptation of Porphyromonas gingivalis to microaerophilic conditions involves increased consumption of formate and reduced utilization of lactate.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2009Article
- Pathway analysis for intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis using a strain ATCC 33277 specific database.BMC microbiology · 2009Article
- Proteomics of Porphyromonas gingivalis within a model oral microbial community.BMC microbiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative proteomic analysis of microbial systems generates large datasets that can be difficult and time-consuming to interpret. Fortunately, many of the data display and gene-clustering tools developed to analyze large transcriptome microarray datasets are also applicable to proteomes. Plots of abundance ratio vs. total signal or spectral counts can highlight regions of random error and putative change. Displaying data in the physical order of the genes in the genome sequence can highlight potential operons. At a basic level of transcriptional organization, identifying operons can give insights into regulatory pathways as well as provide corroborating evidence for proteomic results. Classification and clustering algorithms can group proteins together by their abundance changes under different conditions, helping to identify interesting expression patterns, but often work poorly with noisy data such as typically generated in a large-scale proteomic analysis. Biological interpretation can be aided more directly by overlaying differential protein abundance data onto metabolic pathways, indicating pathways with altered activities. More broadly, ontology tools detect altered levels of protein abundance for different metabolic pathways, molecular functions, and cellular localizations. In practice, pathway analysis and ontology are limited by the level of database curation associated with the organism of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.