ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2008
Treatment options in emerging mold infections.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Evaluation of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution in Susceptibility testing of Amphotericin B, Voriconazole and Caspofungin against Clinical Aspergillus isolates.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015Article
- Molecular analyses of Fusarium isolates recovered from a cluster of invasive mold infections in a Brazilian hospital.BMC infectious diseases · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although Zygomycetes, Fusarium spp, and Scedosporium spp are far less frequent causes of invasive fungal disease than Aspergillus and Candida, they are emerging. These types of infections in severely immunocompromised patients have a common feature: a poor clinical response to antifungal therapy. Infection is usually airborne, although local infections in cases of skin trauma are also possible. These fungi are resistant to some common antifungal agents; therefore, surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue, when possible, should be combined with specific systemic antifungal treatment in immunocompromised patients. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, most experience in the treatment of these infections is with amphotericin B. Experience with new antifungal agents is still limited, and recovery from neutropenia remains the main predictor of a favorable outcome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.