Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18941805›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2009

Bacterial effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhiza development as influenced by the bacteria, fungi, and host plant.

Barbara Pivato, Pierre Offre, Sara Marchelli, Bruno Barbonaglia, Christophe Mougel, Philippe Lemanceau, Graziella Berta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Colonization by the Mycorrhizal HelperFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial Community Selection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara PivatoUniversità del Piemonte Orientale 'Amedeo Avogadro', I-15100, Alessandria, Italy.
Pierre OffreINRA, Université de Bourgogne, UMR 1229 'Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement', CMSE, 21065, Dijon, France.
Sara MarchelliUniversità del Piemonte Orientale 'Amedeo Avogadro', I-15100, Alessandria, Italy.
Bruno BarbonagliaUniversità del Piemonte Orientale 'Amedeo Avogadro', I-15100, Alessandria, Italy.
Christophe MougelINRA, Université de Bourgogne, UMR 1229 'Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement', CMSE, 21065, Dijon, France.
Philippe LemanceauINRA, Université de Bourgogne, UMR 1229 'Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement', CMSE, 21065, Dijon, France. philippe.lemanceau@dijon.inra.fr.
Graziella BertaUniversità del Piemonte Orientale 'Amedeo Avogadro', I-15100, Alessandria, Italy.
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITCentre de Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial strains from mycorrhizal roots (three belonging to Comamonadaceae and one to Oxalobacteraceae) and from non-mycorrhizal roots (two belonging to Comamonadaceae) of Medicago truncatula and two reference strains (Collimonas fungivorans Ter331 and Pseudomonas fluorescens C7R12) were tested for their effect on the in vitro saprophytic growth of Glomus mosseae BEG12 and on its colonization of M. truncatula roots. Only the Oxalobacteraceae strain, isolated from barrel medic mycorrhizal roots, and the reference strain P. fluorescens C7R12 promoted both the saprophytic growth and root colonization of G. mosseae BEG12, indicating that they acted as mycorrhiza helper bacteria. Greatest effects were achieved by P. fluorescens C7R12 and its influence on the saprophytic growth of G. mosseae was compared to that on Gigaspora rosea BEG9 to determine if the bacterial stimulation was fungal specific. This fungal specificity, together with plant specificity, was finally evaluated by comparing bacterial effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis when each of the fungal species was inoculated to two different plant species (M. truncatula and Lycopersicon esculentum). The results obtained showed that promotion of saprophytic growth by P. fluorescens C7R12 was expressed in vitro towards G. mosseae but not towards G. rosea. Bacterial promotion of mycorhization was also expressed towards G. mosseae, but not G. rosea, in roots of M. truncatula and L. esculentum. Taken together, results indicated that enhancement of arbuscular mycorrhiza development was only induced by a limited number of bacteria, promotion by the most efficient bacterial strain being fungal and not plant specific.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaFungiMycorrhizaePlant Physiological PhenomenaPlant RootsPlantsSpecies SpecificitySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID18941805
OpenAlexW2068339578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.