Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1893902›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1991

Training effects of cross-country skiing and running on maximal aerobic cycle performance and on blood lipids.

P Oja, R M Laukkanen, T K Kukkonen-Harjula, I M Vuori, M E Pasanen, S P Niittymäki, T Solakivi

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P OjaPresident Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
R M Laukkanen
T K Kukkonen-Harjula
I M Vuori
M E Pasanen
S P Niittymäki
T Solakivi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic effects of cross-country skiing and running training during two successive winters. Forty-year-old men were randomly assigned into skiing (n = 15 in study 1, n = 16 in study 2), running (n = 16 in study 1 and n = 16 in study 2) and control (n = 17 in study 1 and n = 16 in study 2) groups. Three subjects dropped out of the programme. The training lasted 9-10 weeks with 40-min exercise sessions three times each week. The training intensity was controlled at 75%-85% of the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) using portable heart rate metres and the mean heart rate was 156-157 beats.min-1 in the training groups. In the pooled data of the two studies the mean increase in the VO2max (in ml.min-1.kg-1) on a cycle ergometer was 17% for the skiing group, 13% for the running group and 2% for the control group. The increase in VO2max was highly significant in the combined exercise group compared to the control group but did not differ significantly between the skiing and running groups. The fasting serum concentrations of lipoproteins and insulin did not change significantly in any of the groups. These results suggested that training by cross-country skiing and running of the same duration and intensity at each session for 9-10 weeks improved equally the cardiorespiratory fitness of untrained middle-aged men.

Indexed as

RunningSkiingAdultAnaerobic ThresholdEnergy MetabolismExercise TestHeart RateHumansLipidsMaleOxygen ConsumptionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicLipids

Identifiers

PMID1893902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.