ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2008
Pharmacodynamic modeling of the effect of changes in the environment on cellular lifespan and cellular response.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models for the red blood cell lifespan.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016Article
- Lifespan based indirect response models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2012Review
- Interpretation of transit compartments pharmacodynamic models as lifespan based indirect response models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lifespan-based pharmacodynamic (PD) models of cellular response assume that the lifespan of cells is predetermined at the time of cellular production, despite recognized changes in the cellular environment following production that may alter the survival of the cells. This work extends previously proposed cellular lifespan PD models to incorporate environmental effects on the cell lifespan by considering two basic classes of models from survival analysis: accelerated life and relative risk models. Cellular responses using both model classes were simulated using a steady-state cellular production rate with changes in the environmental effects resulting from three different basic profiles. The environmental effect models were also fitted to the red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin concentration data from six sheep following hematopoietic ablation by busulfan administration. The simulations indicated that the basic shapes of the cellular responses were different between the accelerated life and relative risk models. Due to the more direct physical interpretation, relatively simple steady-state relationship between the cellular response and environmental effects, and the ability to reduce the model to a "point" baseline lifespan distribution, the accelerated life model appears to be a more realistic and flexible model. The analysis of the sheep RBC and hemoglobin data indicated that the environmental effect began to decrease the survival of cells 1-2 weeks following initiation of ablation and that the average "severity" of the environmental effect increased 3.49 (29.5%) (mean (C.V.)) fold under the accelerated life model. Alternative models without an environmental effect did not describe the observed data as well. The proposed environmental effect cellular lifespan PD models allow for the incorporation of arbitrary changes in the conditions of the cellular environment and modeling of environmentally dependent cellular survival. These PD models have potential applications in hematological management of end-stage renal disease, transfusion medicine, and patients undergoing chemotherapy, among other diseases and therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.