Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18937013›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2009

Discussing coronary risk with patients to improve blood pressure treatment: secondary results from the CHECK-UP study.

Steven A Grover, Ilka Lowensteyn, Lawrence Joseph, Mohammed Kaouache, Sylvie Marchand, Louis Coupal, Ghislain Boudreau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02310685 (The Canadian Health Improvement Network to Upgrade Prevention Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02310685 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Canadian Health Improvement Network to Upgrade Prevention Services (CHIN-UPS) - Evaluating a Multidisciplinary Health Promotion Program.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled459ConditionsCardiovascular DiseaseArmsComprehensive e-health wellness program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines for pharmacists: An update.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven A GroverMcGill Cardiovascular Health Improvement Program, The McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. steven.grover@mcgill.ca
Ilka Lowensteyn
Lawrence Joseph
Mohammed Kaouache
Sylvie Marchand
Louis Coupal
Ghislain Boudreau
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAPfizer (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHypertension is common among patients with dyslipidemia but is often poorly treated. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate how a decision aid, used by primary care physicians to improve lipid therapy, impacted on the treatment of hypertension. STUDY

designData were analyzed from patients enrolled in a randomized trial focusing primarily on the treatment of dyslipidemia. Patients received usual care or a coronary risk profile every three months to monitor the risk reduction following lifestyle changes and/or pharmacotherapy to treat dyslipidemia. Hypertension management was assessed based on a post hoc analysis of individuals whose blood pressure exceeded current national hypertension guidelines.

resultsThere were 2,631 subjects who completed the study. Among 1,352 patients without diagnosed hypertension, 30% were above target on at least three consecutive visits. Among 1,279 individuals with known hypertension, 69% were above target on at least two consecutive visits. Overall, patients receiving risk profiles were more likely to receive appropriate antihypertensive therapy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) compared to those receiving usual care. After adjustment for inter-physician variability and potential confounders, the use of the risk profile was associated with an increased likelihood of starting therapy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.06-3.00) or modifying therapy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.91).

conclusionsIn this clinical trial of dyslipidemia management, inadequately controlled hypertension was common, occurring in nearly 50% of individuals. Ongoing coronary risk assessment was associated with more appropriate blood pressure management. Cardiovascular risk assessment decision aids should be further evaluated in a randomized trial of hypertension therapy.

Indexed as

Blood PressurePhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18937013
PMCPMC2607501
OpenAlexW1979744384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.