ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2009
Influence of posture on pharmacokinetics.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioequivalence of a new coated 15 mg primaquine formulation for malaria elimination.Malaria journal · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of RIPK1 Inhibitor GSK2982772 in Healthy Western and Japanese Subjects.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Trial
- Multimodal melphalan delivery: improved safety and outcomes with autologous myeloma transplant in India.Public health action · 2026Article
- Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling During Spaceflight for Analysis of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics in Whole Blood.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Computational modeling of drug dissolution in the human stomach: Effects of posture and gastroparesis on drug bioavailability.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2022Article
- Updated Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oxycodone.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
- Free phenytoin assessment in patients: measured versus calculated blood serum levels.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Long-term and short-term effects of hemodialysis on liver function evaluated using the galactose single-point test.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- Right recumbent position on gastric emptying of water evidenced by (13)C breath testing.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Observational
- Before you analyze a human specimen, think quality, variability, and bias.Analytical chemistry · 2011Review
- Lack of effect of subject posture on intravenous midazolam clearance: implications for hepatic cytochrome P450 3A phenotyping.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBody position may influence physiological characteristics, such as perfusion, gastrointestinal function and plasma volume. These characteristics may interact with key factors determining the pharmacokinetics of drugs (dissolution, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion).
objectivesBased on a systematic literature search, current data on the effect of posture on physiological characteristics and/or pharmacokinetics are summarized, and the relevance of possible effects, such as those presenting in clinical practice and clinical pharmacokinetic studies, is assessed.
resultsPostures which favour rapid gastric emptying (sitting, standing, recumbent right) accelerate the absorption of orally administered drugs. Consequently, these postures favour a shorter time to reach peak plasma drug concentration (t(max)) and a higher maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and--in the case of transient saturation of first-pass metabolism--total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC) in comparison to recumbent left and supine positions (e.g. nifedipine: AUC 30 and 38% higher in standing and right lateral position vs. left lateral position; C(max) 149 and 80% higher, respectively). The magnitude of these postural effects depends strongly on the nature and amount of liquids and food ingested before drug administration and is most pronounced in the fasting state and after administration with a nonnutrient liquid. Changes in splanchnic-hepatic blood flow (e.g. reduction of estimated hepatic perfusion by 37% in standing vs. supine position) may substantially affect the metabolism of orally administered drugs, especially of those with a high/saturable first-pass metabolism. For highly protein-bound drugs (e.g. phenytoin, imipramine), the total plasma concentration has been found to be approximately 10% higher in standing than lying subjects due to changes in plasma volume.
conclusionsPositioning of a patient may be an effective method of enhancing or retarding absorption of some drugs in appropriate clinical situations (e.g. toxic ingestions, bedridden patients). In clinical pharmacokinetic trials, such as bioequivalence studies, defining and maintaining posture precisely is a useful approach for reducing within- and between-subject variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.