Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18936169›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2008

Cellular concentrations of DDB2 regulate dynamic binding of DDB1 at UV-induced DNA damage.

Sergey Alekseev, Martijn S Luijsterburg, Alex Pines, Bart Geverts, Pierre-Olivier Mari, Giuseppina Giglia-Mari, Hannes Lans, Adriaan B Houtsmuller, Leon H F Mullenders, Jan H J Hoeijmakers and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Bioinformatics analysis of expression and function of EXD3 gene in gastric cancer].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Orchestral maneuvers at the damaged sites in nucleotide excision repair.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Damaged DNA induced UV-damaged DNA-binding protein (UV-DDB) dimerization and its roles in chromatinized DNA repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergey AlekseevDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Medical Genetics Center, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn S Luijsterburg
Alex Pines
Bart Geverts
Pierre-Olivier Mari
Giuseppina Giglia-Mari
Hannes Lans
Adriaan B Houtsmuller
Leon H F Mullenders
Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Wim Vermeulen
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the principal pathway for counteracting cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of UV irradiation. To provide insight into the in vivo regulation of the DNA damage recognition step of global genome NER (GG-NER), we constructed cell lines expressing fluorescently tagged damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1). DDB1 is a core subunit of a number of cullin 4-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. UV-activated DDB1-DDB2-CUL4A-ROC1 ubiquitin ligase participates in the initiation of GG-NER and triggers the UV-dependent degradation of its subunit DDB2. We found that DDB1 rapidly accumulates on DNA damage sites. However, its binding to damaged DNA is not static, since DDB1 constantly dissociates from and binds to DNA lesions. DDB2, but not CUL4A, was indispensable for binding of DDB1 to DNA damage sites. The residence time of DDB1 on the damage site is independent of the main damage-recognizing protein of GG-NER, XPC, as well as of UV-induced proteolysis of DDB2. The amount of DDB1 that is temporally immobilized on damaged DNA critically depends on DDB2 levels in the cell. We propose a model in which UV-dependent degradation of DDB2 is important for the release of DDB1 from continuous association to unrepaired DNA and makes DDB1 available for its other DNA damage response functions.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsCell LineCullin ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFluorescent DyesHumansRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA InterferenceUltraviolet RaysCUL4A protein, humanCullin ProteinsDDB1 protein, humanDDB2 protein, humanDNADNA-Binding ProteinsFluorescent DyesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsXPC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID18936169
PMCPMC2593426
OpenAlexW2115576017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.