Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1893294›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international1991

Normal bone particles are preferentially resorbed in the presence of osteocalcin-deficient bone particles in vivo.

D J DeFranco, J Glowacki, K A Cox, J B Lian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Qing'e Decoction on Leptin/Leptin Receptor and Bone Metabolism in Naturally Aging Rats.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An overview of osteocalcin progress.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D J DeFrancoLaboratory for Study of Skeletal Disorders, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Glowacki
K A Cox
J B Lian
Woman's Hospital · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

REGULATION OF BONE RESORPTIONR01AR031330 · NIAMS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI GLOWACKI, JULIE · 1986 to 1991
–
OSTEOCALCIN FUNCTION IN RESORPTIONR01AR035166 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LIAN, JANE B · 1986 to 1994
–
NIAMS NIH HHS AR31330NIAMS NIH HHS AR35166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an in vivo model of osteoclastic bone resorption, we previously showed that osteocalcin-deficient bone particles (BPs), derived from warfarin-treated rats, were resorbed 50% as well as normal BPs and that they recruited fewer osteoclastic cells with decreased tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity. In order to determine the specificity of the resorption response, we evaluated the fate of implanted mixtures of normal and osteocalcin-deficient BPs. Normal and warfarin-treated donor rats were prelabeled in vivo with oxytetracycline to permit identification of BPs from either source. Normal, osteocalcin-deficient, and 50:50 mixtures of BPs (either labeled or unlabeled) were implanted into normal rats and recovered 12 days later for enzymatic (TRAP) and nondecalcified histomorphometric analyses. The incorporated oxytetracycline had no significant effect on resorption of bone particles. The recovered osteocalcin-deficient BPs were surrounded by fewer osteoclastic cells, were resorbed less, and contained less extractable TRAP activity than normal BPs. In mixed BP implants with normal and osteocalcin-deficient BPs, each type of bone particle elicited the same tissue response as when implanted separately. Remarkably, the different particles evoked dissimilar osteoclastic responses and were resorbed to different extents, even when adjacent within the same implant. These data suggest that osteocalcin may act as a substrate signal for resorption and that osteocalcin in the normal BPs does not influence the cellular response to adjacent osteocalcin-deficient BPs.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionAcid PhosphataseAnimalsBone and BonesMaleMicroscopy, ElectronOsteocalcinOsteoclastsOxytetracyclineRatsTartratesWarfarinAcid PhosphataseOsteocalcinOxytetracyclinetartaric acidTartratesWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID1893294
OpenAlexW2148872895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.