Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18931302›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Significant conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks between distantly related eukaryotes.

Scott J Dixon, Yaroslav Fedyshyn, Judice L Y Koh, T S Keshava Prasad, Charly Chahwan, Gordon Chua, Kiana Toufighi, Anastasija Baryshnikova, Jacqueline Hayles, Kwang-Lae Hoe and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The power of many: when genetics met yeasts and high-throughput.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Scott J DixonBanting and Best Department of Medical Research and Department of Molecular Genetics, Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Room 1330, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E1.
Yaroslav Fedyshyn
Judice L Y Koh
T S Keshava Prasad
Charly Chahwan
Gordon Chua
Kiana Toufighi
Anastasija Baryshnikova
Jacqueline Hayles
Kwang-Lae Hoe
Dong-Uk Kim
Han-Oh Park
Chad L Myers
Akhilesh Pandey
Daniel Durocher
Brenda J Andrews
Charles Boone
University of Toronto · CAInstitute of Bioinformatics · INKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRMount Sinai Hospital · CACancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

TCP5: ACTIVE SITE LABELING REAGENT FOR ACETYLTRANSFERASESU54RR020839 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020839NCRR NIH HHS U54RR020839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks define genes that work together to control essential functions and have been studied extensively in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using the synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis technique (ScSGA). The extent to which synthetic lethal or other genetic interaction networks are conserved between species remains uncertain. To address this question, we compared literature-curated and experimentally derived genetic interaction networks for two distantly related yeasts, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and S. cerevisiae. We find that 23% of interactions in a novel, high-quality S. pombe literature-curated network are conserved in the existing S. cerevisiae network. Next, we developed a method, called S. pombe SGA analysis (SpSGA), enabling rapid, high-throughput isolation of genetic interactions in this species. Direct comparison by SpSGA and ScSGA of approximately 220 genes involved in DNA replication, the DNA damage response, chromatin remodeling, intracellular transport, and other processes revealed that approximately 29% of genetic interactions are common to both species, with the remainder exhibiting unique, species-specific patterns of genetic connectivity. We define a conserved yeast network (CYN) composed of 106 genes and 144 interactions and suggest that this network may help understand the shared biology of diverse eukaryotic species.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenes, FungalPhylogenyGenes, LethalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID18931302
PMCPMC2575475
OpenAlexW2083646206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.