Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18929451›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2009

Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later.

Bertha K Madras, Wilson M Compton, Deepa Avula, Tom Stegbauer, Jack B Stein, H Westley Clark

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 281 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
281citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01671501 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Primary Care-Based Interventions to Reduce Alcohol Use Among HIV Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2013 to 2017Enrolled614ConditionsHIV, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Alcoholism, Alcoholic IntoxicationArmsMotivational Interviewing, Email Feedback, Usual Care
NCT02420561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Substance Use Among Depression Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2010 to 2014Enrolled307ConditionsDepression, Substance-Related DisordersArmsMotivational Interviewing, Control (brochure)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

281 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Brief Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Acute and Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

221 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bertha K MadrasHarvard Medical School-NEPRC, 1 Pine Hill Drive, Southborough, MA 01772, USA. bertha_madras@hms.harvard.edu
Wilson M Compton
Deepa Avula
Tom Stegbauer
Jack B Stein
H Westley Clark

Funding

Cocaine-Molecular Targets/Brain Imaging and MedicationsK05DA015305 · NIDA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MADRAS, BERTHA K · 2002 to 2009
$581k
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlcohol screening and brief interventions in medical settings can significantly reduce alcohol use. Corresponding data for illicit drug use is sparse. A Federally funded screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) service program, the largest of its kind to date, was initiated by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in a wide variety of medical settings. We compared illicit drug use at intake and 6 months after drug screening and interventions were administered.

designSBIRT services were implemented in a range of medical settings across six states. A diverse patient population (Alaska Natives, American Indians, African-Americans, Caucasians, Hispanics), was screened and offered score-based progressive levels of intervention (brief intervention, brief treatment, referral to specialty treatment). In this secondary analysis of the SBIRT service program, drug use data was compared at intake and at a 6-month follow-up, in a sample of a randomly selected population (10%) that screened positive at baseline.

resultsOf 459,599 patients screened, 22.7% screened positive for a spectrum of use (risky/problematic, abuse/addiction). The majority were recommended for a brief intervention (15.9%), with a smaller percentage recommended for brief treatment (3.2%) or referral to specialty treatment (3.7%). Among those reporting baseline illicit drug use, rates of drug use at 6-month follow-up (4 of 6 sites), were 67.7% lower (p<0.001) and heavy alcohol use was 38.6% lower (p<0.001), with comparable findings across sites, gender, race/ethnic, age subgroups. Among persons recommended for brief treatment or referral to specialty treatment, self-reported improvements in general health (p<0.001), mental health (p<0.001), employment (p<0.001), housing status (p<0.001), and criminal behavior (p<0.001) were found.

conclusionsSBIRT was feasible to implement and the self-reported patient status at 6 months indicated significant improvements over baseline, for illicit drug use and heavy alcohol use, with functional domains improved, across a range of health care settings and a range of patients.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsAdultAge FactorsAlcoholismCommunity Health CentersCrimeData Interpretation, StatisticalEmploymentEthnicityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMiddle AgedIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID18929451
PMCPMC2760304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.