Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18928659›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2008

Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current status and future opportunities.

Theresa M Harned, Paul Gaynon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DRUG-NEM: Optimizing drug combinations using single-cell perturbation response to account for intratumoral heterogeneity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theresa M HarnedDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, MS 54, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA. tharned@chla.usc.edu
Paul Gaynon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant improvements in primary therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have led to dramatic increases in cure rates over the past few decades. Relapsed ALL, however, remains more common than new diagnoses of many common pediatric malignancies. Outcomes for patients with relapsed ALL remain poor, especially for patients with early bone marrow relapse. However, most relapse patients do achieve a second complete remission, followed by therapeutic options including further chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The level of minimal residual disease after achieving second remission or before transplant may predict outcomes. The substantial likelihood of achieving second remission with familiar drug combinations may discourage participation in formal relapse studies. The high likelihood of achieving a third remission may discourage participation in single-agent trials of new drugs, despite the critical need for novel agents with activity against resistant disease that may improve outcomes for recurrent ALL.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChildClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMedical OncologyPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisRecurrenceRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.