Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18928341›Full record

ReviewExpert review of neurotherapeutics2008

Antiangiogenic therapy in brain tumors.

Sajani S Lakka, Jasti S Rao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Roles of Non-coding RNAs and Angiogenesis in Glioblastoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Theranostic Nanomedicine for Malignant Gliomas.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adaptation to antiangiogenic therapy in neurological tumors.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sajani S LakkaDepartment of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, 1 Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, USA.
Jasti S Rao
Illinois College · USPeoria campus of the University of Illinois System · US

Funding

Cath B and uPAR si RNA constructs regressed glioma growthR01CA116708 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI O'BRYAN, JOHN P · 2005 to 2014
$2.9M
Inhibition of glioma tumor growth by antisense MMP-9R01NS047699 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
Role of uPA and uPAR in Human Glioma InvasivenessR01CA075557 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 1998 to 2009
$2.3M
Growth inhibition of brain tumors by cord blood stem cellsR01NS057529 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Regression of meningioma tumor growth by combination therapyR01NS061835 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Role of TFPI-2 in human gliomas invasivenessR01CA095058 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Suppression of glioma invasion by a bicistronic constuctR01CA092393 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RAO, JASTI S. · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA116708NCI NIH HHS CA75557NCI NIH HHS CA92393NCI NIH HHS CA95058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075557NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116708NINDS NIH HHS NS47699NINDS NIH HHS NS57529NINDS NIH HHS NS61835NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047699NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057529NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis, the recruitment of new blood vessels, is an essential component of tumor progression. Malignant brain tumors are highly vascularized and their growth is angiogenesis-dependent. As such, inhibition of the sprouting of new capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels is one of the most promising antiglioma therapeutic approaches. Numerous classes of molecules have been implicated in regulating angiogenesis and, thus, novel agents that target and counteract angiogenesis are now being developed. The therapeutic trials of a number of angiogenesis inhibitors as antiglioma drugs are currently under intense investigation. Preliminary studies of angiogenic blockade in glioblastoma have been promising and several clinical trials are now underway to develop optimum treatment strategies for antiangiogenic agents. This review will cover state-of-the-art antiangiogenic targets for brain tumor treatment and discuss future challenges. An increased understanding of the angiogenic process, the diversity of its inducers and mediators, appropriate drug schedules and the use of these agents with other modalities may lead to radically new treatment regimens to achieve maximal efficacy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeovascularization, PathologicNerve Tissue ProteinsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm ProteinsNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18928341
PMCPMC2656359
OpenAlexW2098761691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.