ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2008
Staff training improved oral hygiene in patients following stroke.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a Web-Based Health Education Program to Promote Oral Hygiene Care Among Stroke Survivors: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Trial
- Relationship between anxiety/depression and oral health-related quality of life in inpatients of convalescent hospitals.Odontology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesReports were identified using the Cochrane Stroke Group and Oral Health Group trials registers, the Cochrane CENTRAL trial register, Cochrane Library, Medline, Cinahl, Research Findings Electronic Register, National Research Register, ISI Science and Technology Proceedings, Dissertation Abstracts and Conference Papers Index, and the reference lists from relevant papers. Authors and researchers in the field were also contacted. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) that evaluated one or more interventions designed to improve oral hygiene were selected. Trials based on a mixed population were included, provided it was possible to extract data specific to individuals post-stroke. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two review authors independently classified identified trials according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. Clarification was sought from study authors when required.
resultsEight eligible RCT trials were identified but only one provided stroke-specific information. In it, an oral healthcare education training programme delivered to nursing homecare assistants was compared with a delayed training intervention in the control group. Comparisons were made at 1 and 6 months after the intervention, using primary outcome measures of dental plaque and denture plaque, and three secondary outcomes. The data available for the 67 individuals who had suffered a stroke (obtained from the larger cluster-RCT) showed that denture plaque scores were significantly reduced up to 6 months (P<0.00001) after the intervention. Staff knowledge (P 0.0008) and attitudes (P 0.0001) towards oral care also improved significantly despite high staff turnover rates.
conclusionsBased on one study with a small number of stroke survivors, providing specialist oral care training for carers in a nursing-home setting improves their knowledge of and attitudes towards the provision of oral care. In turn, residents\[primes] dentures were cleaner, although other oral hygiene measures did not change. Further evidence relating to oral care interventions is severely lacking, in particular with reference to care in hospital for those following stroke.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.