Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18925391›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2009

Relative potency of proton-pump inhibitors-comparison of effects on intragastric pH.

Julia Kirchheiner, Silke Glatt, Uwe Fuhr, Ulrich Klotz, Ingolf Meineke, Thomas Seufferlein, Jürgen Brockmöller

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 271 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interchangeable Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Based on Relative Potency.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Different dose of new generation proton pump inhibitors for the treatment ofInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia KirchheinerInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 20, 89081 Ulm, Germany. julia.kirchheiner@uni-ulm.de
Silke Glatt
Uwe Fuhr
Ulrich Klotz
Ingolf Meineke
Thomas Seufferlein
Jürgen Brockmöller
University of Göttingen · DEDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology · DEInstitute of Pharmacology · CZUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimComparative potency of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is an important clinical issue. Most available trials have compared the different PPIs at one or a few selected specific dosages, making it difficult to derive quantitative equivalence dosages. Here we derived PPI dose equivalents based on a comprehensive assessment of dose-dependent effects on intragastric pH.

methodsAll available clinical studies reporting the effects of PPIs on mean 24-h intragastric pH were sought from electronic databases including Medline. Studies included were restricted to those targeting the Caucasian population, and healthy volunteers or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. The dose-effect relationships for mean 24-h intragastric pH and for percentage of time with pH > 4 in 24 h were analyzed for each PPI using pharmacodynamic modeling with NONMEM and a model integrating all available data.

resultsFifty-seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Based on the mean 24-h gastric pH, the relative potencies of the five PPIs compared to omeprazole were 0.23, 0.90, 1.00, 1.60, and 1.82 for pantoprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, esomeprazole, and rabeprazole, respectively. Compared with healthy volunteers, patients with GERD needed a 1.9-fold higher dose and Helicobacter pylori-positive individuals needed only about 20% of the dose to achieve a given increase in mean 24-h intragastric pH.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis provides quantitative estimates on clinical potency of individual PPIs that may be helpful when switching between PPIs and for assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific PPIs. However, our estimates must be viewed with caution because only a limited dose range has been tested and not exactly the same study conditions were applied for the different substances.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Dosage CalculationsGastric AcidGastric Acidity DeterminationGastric MucosaGastroesophageal RefluxHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, BiologicalPractice Guidelines as TopicProton Pump InhibitorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18925391
OpenAlexW2156899992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.