Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18924135›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2009

Bivariate association analyses for the mixture of continuous and binary traits with the use of extended generalized estimating equations.

Jianfeng Liu, Yufang Pei, Chris J Papasian, Hong-Wen Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A regression framework to uncover pleiotropy in large-scale electronic health record data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fast and Accurate Genome-Wide Association Test of Multiple Quantitative Traits.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianfeng LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Yufang Pei
Chris J Papasian
Hong-Wen Deng

Funding

Proteome-wide Expression Study of Osteogenic CellsP50AR055081 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2012
$5.0M
ROBUST AND POWERFUL TEST OF CANDIDATE GENES TO BONE MASSR01AR050496 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
Genomic search for bone mass QTLsR01AG026564 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2010
$2.3M
Proteomics Study of Peripheral Blood Monocytes on OsteroporsisR21AG027110 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2006 to 2007
$367k
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR055081NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026564NIA NIH HHS R21 AG027110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association (GWA) study is becoming a powerful tool in deciphering genetic basis of complex human diseases/traits. Currently, the univariate analysis is the most commonly used method to identify genes associated with a certain disease/phenotype under study. A major limitation with the univariate analysis is that it may not make use of the information of multiple correlated phenotypes, which are usually measured and collected in practical studies. The multivariate analysis has proven to be a powerful approach in linkage studies of complex diseases/traits, but it has received little attention in GWA. In this study, we aim to develop a bivariate analytical method for GWA study, which can be used for a complex situation in which continuous trait and a binary trait are measured under study. Based on the modified extended generalized estimating equation (EGEE) method we proposed herein, we assessed the performance of our bivariate analyses through extensive simulations as well as real data analyses. In the study, to develop an EGEE approach for bivariate genetic analyses, we combined two different generalized linear models corresponding to phenotypic variables using a seemingly unrelated regression model. The simulation results demonstrated that our EGEE-based bivariate analytical method outperforms univariate analyses in increasing statistical power under a variety of simulation scenarios. Notably, EGEE-based bivariate analyses have consistent advantages over univariate analyses whether or not there exists a phenotypic correlation between the two traits. Our study has practical importance, as one can always use multivariate analyses as a screening tool when multiple phenotypes are available, without extra costs of statistical power and false-positive rate. Analyses on empirical GWA data further affirm the advantages of our bivariate analytical method.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansModels, GeneticPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID18924135
PMCPMC2745071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.