Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18923680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Evolutionarily conserved transcriptional co-expression guiding embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Yu Sun, Huai Li, Ying Liu, Mark P Mattson, Mahendra S Rao, Ming Zhan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Embryonic stem cell-specific signature in cervical cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu SunBioinformatics Unit, Research Resources Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Huai Li
Ying Liu
Mark P Mattson
Mahendra S Rao
Ming Zhan
National Institute on Aging · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Bioinformatics Service and ResearchZICAG000619 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI ZHAN, MING · 2009 to 2010
$2.2M
Stem Cells And NeurogenesisZ01AG000324 · NIA · AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2002 to 2007
$782k
Stem Cells And NeurogenesisZIAAG000324 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2014
$585k
BioinformaticsZ01AG000619 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI ZHAN, MING · 2008 to 2008
$487k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the molecular mechanisms controlling pluripotency in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is of central importance towards realizing their potentials in medicine and science. Cross-species examination of transcriptional co-expression allows elucidation of fundamental and species-specific mechanisms regulating ESC self-renewal or differentiation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe examined transcriptional co-expression of ESCs from pathways to global networks under the framework of human-mouse comparisons. Using generalized singular value decomposition and comparative partition around medoids algorithms, evolutionarily conserved and divergent transcriptional co-expression regulating pluripotency were identified from ESC-critical pathways including ACTIVIN/NODAL, ATK/PTEN, BMP, CELL CYCLE, JAK/STAT, PI3K, TGFbeta and WNT. A set of transcription factors, including FOX, GATA, MYB, NANOG, OCT, PAX, SOX and STAT, and the FGF response element were identified that represent key regulators underlying the transcriptional co-expression. By transcriptional intervention conducted in silico, dynamic behavior of pathways was examined, which demonstrate how much and in which specific ways each gene or gene combination effects the behavior transition of a pathway in response to ESC differentiation or pluripotency induction. The global co-expression networks of ESCs were dominated by highly connected hub genes such as IGF2, JARID2, LCK, MYCN, NASP, OCT4, ORC1L, PHC1 and RUVBL1, which are possibly critical in determining the fate of ESCs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Through these studies, evolutionary conservation at genomic, transcriptomic, and network levels is shown to be an effective predictor of molecular factors and mechanisms controlling ESC development. Various hypotheses regarding mechanisms controlling ESC development were generated, which could be further validated by in vitro experiments. Our findings shed light on the systems-level understanding of how ESC differentiation or pluripotency arises from the connectivity or networks of genes, and provide a "road-map" for further experimental investigation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell DifferentiationGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsComputer SimulationEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansMicePluripotent Stem CellsResponse ElementsSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18923680
PMCPMC2566604
OpenAlexW2031000162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.