Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18923410›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2008

The rise and fall of bacterial clones: Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Birgitta Henriques-Normark, Christel Blomberg, Jessica Dagerhamn, Patrick Bättig, Staffan Normark

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. TheJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Utilising sigmoid models to predict the spread of antimicrobial resistance at the country level.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Article
  12. The Best of All Worlds:Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Birgitta Henriques-NormarkSwedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control and Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden. birgitta.henriques@smi.ki.se
Christel Blomberg
Jessica Dagerhamn
Patrick Bättig
Staffan Normark

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally spreading bacterial strains belong to clonal types that have the capacity to colonize, spread and cause disease in the community. Recent comparative genomic analyses of well-defined clinical isolates have led to the identification of bacterial properties that are required for the successful spread of bacterial clones. In this Review, we discuss the evolution of bacterial clones, the importance of recombination versus mutations for evolution of clones, common methods used to study clonal relationships among bacteria, factors that may contribute to the clonal spread of bacteria and the potential relevance of bacterial clones to clinical disease. We focus on the common pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae, although other bacteria are also briefly discussed, such as Helicobacter pylori, Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularDNA, BacterialHelicobacter pyloriHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPneumococcal InfectionsRecombination, GeneticStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID18923410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.