Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18923398›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2009

Dopamine uptake changes associated with cocaine self-administration.

Erik B Oleson, Sanjay Talluri, Steven R Childers, James E Smith, David C S Roberts, Keith D Bonin, Evgeny A Budygin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. HIV Infection and Neurocognitive Disorders in the Context of Chronic Drug Abuse: Evidence for Divergent Findings Dependent upon Prior Drug History.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Single Amphetamine Infusion Reverses Deficits in Dopamine Nerve-Terminal Function Caused by a History of Cocaine Self-Administration.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik B OlesonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Sanjay Talluri
Steven R Childers
James E Smith
David C S Roberts
Keith D Bonin
Evgeny A Budygin
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

A Novel Animal Model of Cocaine AddictionR01DA014030 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JONES, SARA RAULERSON · 2001 to 2015
$3.2M
The role of dopamine mechanisms in the development of addiction to cocaineK01DA021634 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BUDYGIN, EVGENY ALEXANDER · 2006 to 2010
$521k
Neurobiological Study of the Reinforcing Efficacy of Cocaine in Unique ModelsF31DA024525 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OLESON, ERIK BENJAMIN · 2008 to 2010
$86k
NIDA NIH HHS DA021634NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA024525NIDA NIH HHS F31DA024525NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA021634NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014030NIDA NIH HHS R01DA14030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was designed to reveal the relationship between cocaine-induced dopamine uptake changes and patterns of cocaine self-administration observed under a fixed-ratio schedule. Cocaine was intravenously infused into anesthetized rats, according to inter-infusion intervals obtained from self-administering animals, and dopamine uptake changes (apparent K(m)) were assessed in the nucleus accumbens using voltammetry. The data demonstrate that cocaine-induced dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibition accounts for the accumbal dopamine fluctuations, which are associated with the cyclic regularity of cocaine intake observed during self-administration. Specifically, the inter-infusion intervals that are maintained during cocaine self-administration correlate with the maintenance of a rapidly changing level of dopamine uptake inhibition, which appears to be tightly regulated. Furthermore, this maintained level of dopamine uptake inhibition was found to shift upward using intervals from animals that had shown an escalation in the rate of cocaine self-administration. Although no significant change in the apparent K(m) was revealed in animals that exhibited an escalation in the rate of cocaine intake, an increased dopamine uptake rate was found suggesting an upregulation of DAT number in response to a history of high cocaine intake. This is the first demonstration of the tight correlation that exists between the level of dopamine uptake inhibition and rates of cocaine self-administration. Moreover, a new mathematical model was created that quantitatively describes the changes in cocaine-induced dopamine uptake and correctly predicts the level of dopamine uptake inhibition. This model permits a computational interpretation of cocaine-induced dopamine uptake changes during cocaine self-administration.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsInjections, IntravenousMaleModels, BiologicalNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationCocaineDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsDopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18923398
PMCPMC2656581
OpenAlexW1969008137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.