Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18923074›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2008

Myc's broad reach.

Martin Eilers, Robert N Eisenman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 569 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
569citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

569 citing papers in PubMed, 919 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. MYCN amplification defines an aggressive phenotype in IDH-mutant gliomas.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Genes · 2024
    Article

509 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin EilersInstitute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Robert N Eisenman
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstitute of Molecular Biology · DE

Funding

Regulation of cell growth and proliferation by MycR01CA020525 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI EISENMAN, ROBERT NEIL · 1985 to 2018
$10.7M
Transcription Factors in Stem Cell Self-Renewal and DifferentationP01HL084205 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERNSTEIN, IRWIN D · 2007 to 2011
$9.7M
MYC ONCOPROTEIN FUNCTIONR01CA057138 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI EISENMAN, ROBERT NEIL · 1991 to 2018
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA020525NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057138NCI NIH HHS R01-CA20525NCI NIH HHS R01-CA57138NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL084205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the myc gene family in the biology of normal and cancer cells has been intensively studied since the early 1980s. myc genes, responding to diverse external and internal signals, express transcription factors (c-, N-, and L-Myc) that heterodimerize with Max, bind DNA, and modulate expression of a specific set of target genes. Over the last few years, expression profiling, genomic binding studies, and genetic analyses in mammals and Drosophila have led to an expanded view of Myc function. This review is focused on two major aspects of Myc: the nature of the genes and pathways that are targeted by Myc, and the role of Myc in stem cell and cancer biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID18923074
PMCPMC2751281
OpenAlexW2112738731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.