Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18922765›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2009

Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Taphrinomycotina, including Schizosaccharomyces fission yeasts.

Yu Liu, Jessica W Leigh, Henner Brinkmann, Melanie T Cushion, Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Hervé Philippe, B Franz Lang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Retracing the evolution ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu LiuRobert Cedergren Centre, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jessica W Leigh
Henner Brinkmann
Melanie T Cushion
Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta
Hervé Philippe
B Franz Lang
Université de Montréal · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

PNEUMOCYSTIS GENOME PROJECTR01AI044651 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI CUSHION, MELANIE T · 1999 to 2004
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several morphologically dissimilar ascomycete fungi including Schizosaccharomyces, Taphrina, Saitoella, Pneumocystis, and Neolecta have been grouped into the taxon Taphrinomycotina (Archiascomycota or Archiascomycotina), originally based on rRNA phylogeny. These analyses lack statistically significant support for the monophyly of this grouping, and although confirmed by more recent multigene analyses, this topology is contradicted by mitochondrial phylogenies. To resolve this inconsistency, we have assembled phylogenomic mitochondrial and nuclear data sets from four distantly related taphrinomycotina taxa: Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pneumocystis carinii, Saitoella complicata, and Taphrina deformans. Our phylogenomic analyses based on nuclear data (113 proteins) conclusively support the monophyly of Taphrinomycotina, diverging as a sister group to Saccharomycotina + Pezizomycotina. However, despite the improved taxon sampling, Taphrinomycotina continue to be paraphyletic with the mitochondrial data set (13 proteins): Schizosaccharomyces species associate with budding yeasts (Saccharomycotina) and the other Taphrinomycotina group as a sister group to Saccharomycotina + Pezizomycotina. Yet, as Schizosaccharomyces and Saccharomycotina species are fast evolving, the mitochondrial phylogeny may be influenced by a long-branch attraction (LBA) artifact. After removal of fast-evolving sequence positions from the mitochondrial data set, we recover the monophyly of Taphrinomycotina. Our combined results suggest that Taphrinomycotina is a legitimate taxon, that this group of species diverges as a sister group to Saccharomycotina + Pezizomycotina, and that phylogenetic positioning of yeasts and fission yeasts with mitochondrial data is plagued by a strong LBA artifact.

Indexed as

AscomycotaDNA, ComplementaryDNA, FungalExpressed Sequence TagsFungal ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhylogenySchizosaccharomycesDNA, ComplementaryDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18922765
PMCPMC8929177
OpenAlexW2169956790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.