Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18854958›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2009

Practical limitations of bioresorbable membranes in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions.

Rizal Lim, Jonathan M Morrill, Ryan C Lynch, Karen L Reed, Adam C Gower, Susan E Leeman, Arthur F Stucchi, James M Becker

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of Hydrogen-Rich Saline on Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesion Bands Formation in Mice.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ghrelin ameliorates adhesions in a postsurgical mouse model.The Journal of surgical research · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Review
  17. A sprayable hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier exhibits regional adhesion reduction efficacy and does not impair intestinal healing.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rizal LimDepartment of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, 88 East Newton Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Jonathan M Morrill
Ryan C Lynch
Karen L Reed
Adam C Gower
Susan E Leeman
Arthur F Stucchi
James M Becker
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntra-abdominal adhesions are a significant source of postoperative morbidity. Bioresorbable barriers composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose (HA/CMC) reduce adhesion formation by physically separating injured or healing peritoneal surfaces. To assess whether the efficacy of a physical barrier can extend beyond the site of application, we evaluated the effectiveness of an HA/CMC barrier in preventing adhesions distal to the site of placement.

methodsAdhesions were induced in rats by creating peritoneal ischemic buttons on either side of a midline incision. An HA/CMC barrier (Seprafilm Genzyme) was intraoperatively placed either under the midline incision, unilaterally over half the ischemic buttons, or bilaterally over all ischemic buttons. Control buttons received no HA/CMC. On day 7 adhesions were scored. In similar experiments, peritoneal fluid was collected at 24 h to assess the effects of HA/CMC on tissue plasminogen activator activity.

resultsPlacement of HA/CMC under the midline incision did not reduce adhesion formation to distal ischemic buttons (72 +/- 7%) compared to controls (80 +/- 8%). Unilateral placement of HA/CMC significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to those ischemic buttons over which the barrier was applied (35 +/- 7%) compared to both contralateral (83 +/- 9%) and control (80 +/- 8%) ischemic buttons. The bilateral application of HA/CMC also significantly (p < 0.05) reduced adhesion formation to all ischemic buttons compared to controls (22 +/- 7% vs. 66 +/- 7%, respectively). HA/CMC did not affect peritoneal tPA activity.

conclusionsEffective adhesion reduction by the physical barrier HA/CMC appears to be limited to the site of application in this rat model. Despite the presence of a bioresorbable membrane at predicted sites of adhesion formation in the peritoneal cavity, adhesions readily form to distal unprotected sites.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialAbdomenAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDisease Models, AnimalMalePostoperative ComplicationsRatsRats, WistarTissue AdhesionsMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID18854958
OpenAlexW1986512466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.