Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18854573›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2008

Long-term disease-free survival after gemtuzumab, intermediate-dose cytarabine, and mitoxantrone in patients with CD33(+) primary resistant or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Patrice Chevallier, Jacques Delaunay, Pascal Turlure, Arnaud Pigneux, Mathilde Hunault, Richard Garand, Thierry Guillaume, Herve Avet-Loiseau, Nathalia Dmytruk, Stephane Girault and 4 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibody-Based Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrice ChevallierService d'Hématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France. patrice.chevallier@chu-nantes.fr
Jacques Delaunay
Pascal Turlure
Arnaud Pigneux
Mathilde Hunault
Richard Garand
Thierry Guillaume
Herve Avet-Loiseau
Nathalia Dmytruk
Stephane Girault
Noel Milpied
Norbert Ifrah
Mohamad Mohty
Jean-Luc Harousseau
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the antitumor activity and safety of a combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), intermediate-dose cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (MIDAM) in patients with refractory or relapsed CD33(+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe treated 62 patients with refractory (n = 18) or relapsed (n = 44) CD33(+) AML. Median age was 55.5 years. Salvage regimen consisted of GO 9 mg/m(2) on day 4, cytarabine 1 g/m(2) every 12 hours on days 1 through 5, and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 through 3. Median follow-up time was 26.5 months.

resultsThirty-one patients (50%) achieved complete remission (CR), and eight patients (13%) had CR with delayed platelet recovery (CRp); the overall response (OR; CR + CRp) rate was 63%. A significantly higher OR rate was achieved in patients who had relapsed versus refractory AML (73% v 39%, respectively; P = .007) and patients with CD33 expression more than 98% of the blast population versus less than 98% (79% v 52.3%, respectively; P = .03). The overall, event-free, and disease-free survival rates were 41%, 33%, and 53% at 2 years, respectively. Leukocytosis more than 20,000/microL at MIDAM therapy, high-risk cytogenetics, and absence of postremission therapy were adverse prognostic factors. Age, disease status, and/or CD33 expression did not influence survival parameters. Four early toxic deaths occurred; a grade 3 to 4 hyperbilirubinemia rate of 16% was observed, and two patients had veno-occlusive disease (3%).

conclusionThe MIDAM regimen seems to be an effective salvage regimen for refractory/relapsed CD33(+) AML patients. These encouraging results support the need for a randomized phase III trial before considering this combination of GO and chemotherapy as superior or the standard of care treatment for refractory/relapsed CD33(+) AML patients.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmSalvage TherapyAminoglycosidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCohort StudiesCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFranceGemtuzumabHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateAminoglycosidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD33 protein, humanCytarabineGemtuzumabMitoxantroneSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3

Identifiers

PMID18854573
OpenAlexW2066757270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.