Trial reportIntensive care medicine2009
Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure after lung resection: an observational study.
Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-invasive ventilation in postoperative patients: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2011Pooled it
- [Efficacy Analysis of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Patients Accepting Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022Trial
- Early nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after lung resection: a randomized trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Early postoperative prophylactic noninvasive ventilation after major lung resection in COPD patients: a randomized controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2014Trial
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after lung resection: a randomized clinical trial.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2014Trial
- Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula with conventional oxygen therapy for preventing postoperative hypoxemia in patients with lung resection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Nasal pillow noninvasive ventilation versus high-flow nasal therapy after extubation in surgical intensive care patients: A propensity-matched cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- [Severity Factors of Pulmonary Aspergilloma in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona Hospital, Antananarivo, Madagascar].Medecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2021Article
- Preventive or curative postoperative noninvasive ventilation after thoracic surgery: still a grey zone?Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
- Non-invasive ventilation in the postoperative period: Is there a role?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2011Article
- Pneumonia associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation: an analysis of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system database.Intensive care medicine · 2010Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009. Part III: mechanical ventilation, acute lung injury and respiratory distress syndrome, pediatrics, ethics, and miscellanea.Intensive care medicine · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA single prospective randomized study found that, in selected patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) following lung resection, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) decreases the need for endotracheal mechanical ventilation and improves clinical outcome.
methodWe prospectively evaluated early NIV use for ARF after lung resection during a 4-year period in the setting of a medical and a surgical ICU of a university hospital. We documented demographics, initial clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes. NIV failure was defined as the need for tracheal intubation.
resultsAmong 690 patients at risk of severe complications following lung resection, 113 (16.3%) experienced ARF, which was initially supported by NIV in 89 (78.7%), including 59 with hypoxemic ARF (66.3%) and 30 with hypercapnic ARF (33.7%). The overall success rate of NIV was 85.3% (76/89). In-ICU mortality was 6.7% (6/89). The mortality rate following NIV failure was 46.1%. Predictive factors of NIV failure in univariate analysis were age (P = 0.046), previous cardiac comorbidities (P = 0.0075), postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.0016), admission in the surgical ICU (P = 0.034), no initial response to NIV (P < 0.0001) and occurrence of noninfectious complications (P = 0.037). Only two independent factors were significantly associated with NIV failure in multivariate analysis: cardiac comorbidities (odds ratio, 11.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-68.3; P = 0.007) and no initial response to NIV (odds ratio, 117.6; 95% confidence interval, 10.6-1305.8; P = 0.0001).
conclusionThis prospective survey confirms the feasibility and efficacy of NIV in ARF following lung resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18853141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.