Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18852443›Full record

ReviewNeurology2008

Update on blepharospasm: report from the BEBRF International Workshop.

Mark Hallett, Craig Evinger, Joseph Jankovic, Mark Stacy, BEBRF International Workshop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Long-term depression-like plasticity of the blink reflex for the treatment of blepharospasm.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2013
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP): An Orthoptic Assessment.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The pathogenesis of blepharospasm.Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark HallettHuman Motor Control Section, NINDS, NIH, 10 Center Drive MSC 1428, Bethesda, MD 20892-1428, USA. hallettm@ninds.nih.gov
Craig Evinger
Joseph Jankovic
Mark Stacy
BEBRF International Workshop

Funding

Pathophysiology of Basal Ganglia DisordersZIANS003031 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK · 2009 to 2023
$22.7M
CONTROL OF THE EYELIDS IN NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL STATESR01EY007391 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI EVINGER, LESLIE CRAIG · 1987 to 2011
$3.9M
Intramural NIH HHSNEI NIH HHS EY07391NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review updates understanding and research on blepharospasm, a subtype of focal dystonia. Topics covered include clinical aspects, pathology, pathophysiology, animal models, dry eye, photophobia, epidemiology, genetics, and treatment. Blepharospasm should be differentiated from apraxia of eyelid opening. New insights into pathology and pathophysiology are derived from different types of imaging, including magnetic resonance studies. Physiologic studies indicate increased plasticity and trigeminal sensitization. While botulinum neurotoxin injections are the mainstay of therapy, other therapies are on the horizon.

Indexed as

AnimalsApraxiasBlepharospasmDystonic DisordersEducationHumansOculomotor MusclesPhotophobia

Identifiers

PMID18852443
PMCPMC2676990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.