Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18851828›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2008

Chromatin insulators: regulatory mechanisms and epigenetic inheritance.

Ashley M Bushey, Elizabeth R Dorman, Victor G Corces

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Impact of Space and Time on the Functional Output of the Genome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of Putative Epigenetic Regulatory Elements in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley M BusheyDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Elizabeth R Dorman
Victor G Corces

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF SUPPRESSION IN DROSOPHILAR01GM035463 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CORCES, VICTOR G. · 1986 to 2020
$10.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM035463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancer-blocking insulators are DNA elements that disrupt the communication between a regulatory sequence, such as an enhancer or a silencer, and a promoter. Insulators participate in both transcriptional regulation and global nuclear organization, two features of chromatin that are thought to be maintained from one generation to the next through epigenetic mechanisms. Furthermore, there are many regulatory mechanisms in place that enhance or hinder insulator activity. These modes of regulation could be used to establish cell-type-specific insulator activity that is epigenetically inherited along a cell and/or organismal lineage. This review will discuss the evidence for epigenetic inheritance and regulation of insulator function.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticInsulator ElementsAnimalsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenome, InsectHumansMiceModels, GeneticRepressor ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18851828
PMCPMC2576288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.