Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18849017›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2009

Cardiac gene regulatory networks in Drosophila.

Anton L Bryantsev, Richard M Cripps

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The heart of plastic: utilizing theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  4. Drosophila as a Model to Understand Second Heart Field Development.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  5. ETS1 and HLHS: Implications for the Role of the Endocardium.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
  6. Mending a broken heart:Disease models & mechanisms · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. On the Morphology of the Drosophila Heart.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Cellular Mechanisms of Drosophila Heart Morphogenesis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anton L BryantsevDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
Richard M Cripps

Funding

GENETIC REGULATION OF MUSCLE FIBER DIVERSITYR01GM061738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW · 2001 to 2022
$6.4M
Genetic regulation of cell fate in the Drosophila heartR01HL080545 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI CRIPPS, RICHARD MATTHEW · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL080545NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080545NIGMS NIH HHS GM61738NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila system has proven a powerful tool to help unlock the regulatory processes that occur during specification and differentiation of the embryonic heart. In this review, we focus upon a temporal analysis of the molecular events that result in heart formation in Drosophila, with a particular emphasis upon how genomic and other cutting-edge approaches are being brought to bear upon the subject. We anticipate that systems-level approaches will contribute greatly to our comprehension of heart development and disease in the animal kingdom.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsDrosophilaEmbryo, NonmammalianHeart

Identifiers

PMID18849017
PMCPMC2706142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.