ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008
Unique genes in plants: specificities and conserved features throughout evolution.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ABAP1 interacting protein 10 (AIP10) exerts a dual role in the cell cycle and primary metabolism pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Genome Analysis of Three Halobacillus Strains Isolated From Saline Environments Reveal Potential Salt Tolerance and Algicidal Mechanisms.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of the NHX Gene Family and Its Regulation Under Salt and Drought Stress in Quinoa (Genes · 2025Article
- Fitness difference between two synonymous mutations of Phytophthora infestans ATP6 gene.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- The conservation of gene models can support genome annotation.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Heterologous expression of a lycophyte protein enhances angiosperm seedling vigor.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Bird nests as botanical time capsules: DNA barcoding identifies the contents of contemporary and historical nests.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparative transcriptomics uncovers differences in photoautotrophic versus photoheterotrophic modes of nutrition in relation to secondary metabolites biosynthesis in Swertia chirayita.Molecular biology reports · 2018Article
- Genome-Based Selection and Characterization of Fusarium circinatum-Specific Sequences.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Gene Duplicability of Core Genes Is Highly Consistent across All Angiosperms.The Plant cell · 2016Article
- Single-copy gene based 50 K SNP chip for genetic studies and molecular breeding in rice.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Explosive tandem and segmental duplications of multigenic families in Eucalyptus grandis.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Genome-wide analysis reveals diverged patterns of codon bias, gene expression, and rates of sequence evolution in picea gene families.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Photosystem II Assembly from Scratch.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
- An easy-to-use primer design tool to address paralogous loci and T-DNA insertion sites in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant methods · 2014Article
- Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Computational predictions provide insights into the biology of TAL effector target sites.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Ascorbate peroxidase-related (APx-R) is not a duplicable gene.Plant signaling & behavior · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlant genomes contain a high proportion of duplicated genes as a result of numerous whole, segmental and local duplications. These duplications lead up to the formation of gene families, which are the usual material for many evolutionary studies. However, all characterized genomes include single-copy (unique) genes that have not received much attention. Unlike gene duplication, gene loss is not an unspecific mechanism but is rather influenced by a functional selection. In this context, we have established and used stringent criteria in order to identify suitable sets of unique genes present in plant proteomes. Comparisons of unique genes in the green phylum were used to characterize the gene and protein features exhibited by both conserved and species-specific unique genes.
resultsWe identified the unique genes within both A. thaliana and O. sativa genomes and classified them according to the number of homologs in the alternative species: none (U{1:0}), one (U{1:1}) or several (U{1:m}). Regardless of the species, all the genes in these groups present some conserved characteristics, such as small average protein size and abnormal intron number. In order to understand the origin and function of unique genes, we further characterized the U{1:1} gene pairs. The possible involvement of sequence convergence in the creation of U{1:1} pairs was discarded due to the frequent conservation of intron positions. Furthermore, an orthology relationship between the two members of each U{1:1} pair was strongly supported by a high conservation in the protein sizes and transcription levels. Within the promoter of the unique conserved genes, we found a number of TATA and TELO boxes that specifically differed from their mean number in the whole genome. Many unique genes have been conserved as unique through evolution from the green alga Ostreococcus lucimarinus to higher plants. Plant unique genes may also have homologs in bacteria and we showed a link between the targeting towards plastids of proteins encoded by plant nuclear unique genes and their homology with a bacterial protein.
conclusionMany of the A. thaliana and O. sativa unique genes are conserved in plants for which the ancestor diverged at least 725 million years ago (MYA). Half of these genes are also present in other eukaryotic and/or prokaryotic species. Thus, our results indicate that (i) a strong negative selection pressure has conserved a number of genes as unique in genomes throughout evolution, (ii) most unique genes are subjected to a low divergence rate, (iii) they have some features observed in housekeeping genes but for most of them there is no functional annotation and (iv) they may have an ancient origin involving a possible gene transfer from ancestral chloroplasts or bacteria to the plant nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.