ArticleBMC genomics2008
Genomics research: world survey of public funding.
Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Genetic Service Delivery Models for the Provision of Genetic Testing in Europe: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of strategies that increase the recruitment and retention of African American adults in genetic and genomic studies.The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc · 2011Pooled it
- The Scourges: Why Abortion Is Even More Morally Serious than Miscarriage.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2023Article
- Reply to Townsend and Cowl.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome.Science advances · 2021Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Radiomics and Deep Learning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Targeted Next Generation Sequencing for malaria research in Africa: current status and outlook.Malaria journal · 2019Article
- Trends in the characteristics of human functional genomic data on the gene expression omnibus, 2001-2017.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019Article
- Cost-effectiveness analyses of genetic and genomic diagnostic tests.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- The economic case for precision medicine.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2018Article
- Sharing the Knowledge: Sharing Aggregate Genomic Findings with Research Participants in Developing Countries.Developing world bioethics · 2015Review
- Widening participation would be key in enhancing bioinformatics and genomics research in Africa.Applied & translational genomics · 2015Article
- Developing expertise in bioinformatics for biomedical research in Africa.Applied & translational genomics · 2015Article
- Rethinking our public health genetics research paradigm.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- The emergence of commercial genomics: analysis of the rise of a biotechnology subsector during the Human Genome Project, 1990 to 2004.Genome medicine · 2013Article
- One community's effort to control genetic disease.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Risk assessment and communication tools for genotype associations with multifactorial phenotypes: the concept of "edge effect" and cultivating an ethical bridge between omics innovations and society.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the past two decades, genomics has evolved as a scientific research discipline. Genomics research was fueled initially by government and nonprofit funding sources, later augmented by private research and development (R&D) funding. Citizens and taxpayers of many countries have funded much of the research, and have expectations about access to the resulting information and knowledge. While access to knowledge gained from all publicly funded research is desired, access is especially important for fields that have broad social impact and stimulate public dialogue. Genomics is one such field, where public concerns are raised for reasons such as health care and insurance implications, as well as personal and ancestral identification. Thus, genomics has grown rapidly as a field, and attracts considerable interest.
resultsOne way to study the growth of a field of research is to examine its funding. This study focuses on public funding of genomics research, identifying and collecting data from major government and nonprofit organizations around the world, and updating previous estimates of world genomics research funding, including information about geographical origins. We initially identified 89 publicly funded organizations; we requested information about each organization's funding of genomics research. Of these organizations, 48 responded and 34 reported genomics research expenditures (of those that responded but did not supply information, some did not fund such research, others could not quantify it). The figures reported here include all the largest funders and we estimate that we have accounted for most of the genomics research funding from government and nonprofit sources.
conclusionAggregate spending on genomics research from 34 funding sources averaged around $2.9 billion in 2003-2006. The United States spent more than any other country on genomics research, corresponding to 35% of the overall worldwide public funding (compared to 49% US share of public health research funding for all purposes). When adjusted to genomics funding intensity, however, the United States dropped below Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Canada, as measured both by genomics research expenditure per capita and per Gross Domestic Product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.