ArticlePLoS genetics2008
A position effect on the heritability of epigenetic silencing.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing fatty acid and omega-3 production in Schizochytrium sp. using developed safe-harboring expression system.Journal of biological engineering · 2024Article
- The Genomic Shock Hypothesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of Transposable Elements after Interspecific Hybridization in Plants.Epigenomes · 2023Review
- Transcriptional repression in stochastic gene expression, patterning, and cell fate specification.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- Heterochromatin is a quantitative trait associated with spontaneous epiallele formation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Silencing ofGenetics · 2020Article
- Mobilization of Pack-CACTA transposons in Arabidopsis suggests the mechanism of gene shuffling.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Current status and perspectives of genome editing technology for microalgae.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2017Review
- Stable Patterns of CENH3 Occupancy Through Maize Lineages Containing Genetically Similar Centromeres.Genetics · 2015Article
- Mutagenesis of barley malting quality QTLs with Ds transposons.Functional & integrative genomics · 2012Article
- Molecular mechanisms of epigenetic variation in plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Review
- Signed outside: a surface marker system for transgenic cytoplasmic proteins.Gene therapy · 2010Article
- Article
- Derepression of the plant Chromovirus LORE1 induces germline transposition in regenerated plants.PLoS genetics · 2010Article
- Long human CHGA flanking chromosome 14 sequence required for optimal BAC transgenic "rescue" of disease phenotypes in the mouse Chga knockout.Physiological genomics · 2010Article
- The genetic signatures of noncoding RNAs.PLoS genetics · 2009Review
- Leaving the past behind.PLoS genetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In animals and yeast, position effects have been well documented. In animals, the best example of this process is Position Effect Variegation (PEV) in Drosophila melanogaster. In PEV, when genes are moved into close proximity to constitutive heterochromatin, their expression can become unstable, resulting in variegated patches of gene expression. This process is regulated by a variety of proteins implicated in both chromatin remodeling and RNAi-based silencing. A similar phenomenon is observed when transgenes are inserted into heterochromatic regions in fission yeast. In contrast, there are few examples of position effects in plants, and there are no documented examples in either plants or animals for positions that are associated with the reversal of previously established silenced states. MuDR transposons in maize can be heritably silenced by a naturally occurring rearranged version of MuDR. This element, Muk, produces a long hairpin RNA molecule that can trigger DNA methylation and heritable silencing of one or many MuDR elements. In most cases, MuDR elements remain inactive even after Muk segregates away. Thus, Muk-induced silencing involves a directed and heritable change in gene activity in the absence of changes in DNA sequence. Using classical genetic analysis, we have identified an exceptional position at which MuDR element silencing is unstable. Muk effectively silences the MuDR element at this position. However, after Muk is segregated away, element activity is restored. This restoration is accompanied by a reversal of DNA methylation. To our knowledge, this is the first documented example of a position effect that is associated with the reversal of epigenetic silencing. This observation suggests that there are cis-acting sequences that alter the propensity of an epigenetically silenced gene to remain inactive. This raises the interesting possibility that an important feature of local chromatin environments may be the capacity to erase previously established epigenetic marks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.