Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18846219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Probing metagenomics by rapid cluster analysis of very large datasets.

Weizhong Li, John C Wooley, Adam Godzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TBC: a clustering algorithm based on prokaryotic taxonomy.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Metagenomics and the protein universe.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metagenomics: Facts and Artifacts, and Computational Challenges*Journal of computer science and technology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weizhong LiCalifornia Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
John C Wooley
Adam Godzik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe scale and diversity of metagenomic sequencing projects challenge both our technical and conceptual approaches in gene and genome annotations. The recent Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) expedition yielded millions of predicted protein sequences, which significantly altered the landscape of known protein space by more than doubling its size and adding thousands of new families (Yooseph et al., 2007 PLoS Biol 5, e16). Such datasets, not only by their sheer size, but also by many other features, defy conventional analysis and annotation methods. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, we describe an approach for rapid analysis of the sequence diversity and the internal structure of such very large datasets by advanced clustering strategies using the newly modified CD-HIT algorithm. We performed a hierarchical clustering analysis on the 17.4 million Open Reading Frames (ORFs) identified from the GOS study and found over 33 thousand large predicted protein clusters comprising nearly 6 million sequences. Twenty percent of these clusters did not match known protein families by sequence similarity search and might represent novel protein families. Distributions of the large clusters were illustrated on organism composition, functional class, and sample locations. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our clustering took about two orders of magnitude less computational effort than the similar protein family analysis of original GOS study. This approach will help to analyze other large metagenomic datasets in the future. A Web server with our clustering results and annotations of predicted protein clusters is available online at http://tools.camera.calit2.net/gos under the CAMERA project.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisDatabases, ProteinAlgorithmsGenomeOceans and SeasOpen Reading FramesProteinsSeawaterSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID18846219
PMCPMC2557142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.