ArticlePloS one2008
Probing metagenomics by rapid cluster analysis of very large datasets.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a PMA-qPCR method for accurate quantification of viableFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- PathoFact: a pipeline for the prediction of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes in metagenomic data.Microbiome · 2021Article
- A Multi-omics Approach to Unraveling the Microbiome-Mediated Effects of Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharides in Overweight Humans.mSystems · 2019Article
- Genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2017Article
- Distinct interacting core taxa in co-occurrence networks enable discrimination of polymicrobial oral diseases with similar symptoms.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Composition-based classification of short metagenomic sequences elucidates the landscapes of taxonomic and functional enrichment of microorganisms.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Exploration of noncoding sequences in metagenomes.PloS one · 2013Article
- Anopheles salivary gland proteomes from major malaria vectors.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Article
- TBC: a clustering algorithm based on prokaryotic taxonomy.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2012Article
- WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Metagenomics and the protein universe.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011Review
- Expansion of the protein repertoire in newly explored environments: human gut microbiome specific protein families.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2010Article
- CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Signal processing for metagenomics: extracting information from the soup.Current genomics · 2009Article
- Analysis and comparison of very large metagenomes with fast clustering and functional annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Metagenomics: Facts and Artifacts, and Computational Challenges*Journal of computer science and technology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe scale and diversity of metagenomic sequencing projects challenge both our technical and conceptual approaches in gene and genome annotations. The recent Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) expedition yielded millions of predicted protein sequences, which significantly altered the landscape of known protein space by more than doubling its size and adding thousands of new families (Yooseph et al., 2007 PLoS Biol 5, e16). Such datasets, not only by their sheer size, but also by many other features, defy conventional analysis and annotation methods. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsIn this study, we describe an approach for rapid analysis of the sequence diversity and the internal structure of such very large datasets by advanced clustering strategies using the newly modified CD-HIT algorithm. We performed a hierarchical clustering analysis on the 17.4 million Open Reading Frames (ORFs) identified from the GOS study and found over 33 thousand large predicted protein clusters comprising nearly 6 million sequences. Twenty percent of these clusters did not match known protein families by sequence similarity search and might represent novel protein families. Distributions of the large clusters were illustrated on organism composition, functional class, and sample locations. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our clustering took about two orders of magnitude less computational effort than the similar protein family analysis of original GOS study. This approach will help to analyze other large metagenomic datasets in the future. A Web server with our clustering results and annotations of predicted protein clusters is available online at http://tools.camera.calit2.net/gos under the CAMERA project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.