ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: a simple method and its possibilities and limitations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- SEOR2 in Arabidopsis mediates CaScientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational discovery of potential therapeutic agents against brain-eating amoeba (Naegleria fowleri).PloS one · 2025Article
- The in silico and in vitro analysis of donepezil derivatives for Anopheles acetylcholinesterase inhibition.PloS one · 2022Article
- A single amino acid polymorphism in a conserved effector of the multihost blast fungus pathogen expands host-target binding spectrum.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Experimental and molecular predictions of the adjuvanticity of snail mucin on hepatitis B vaccine in albino mice.PloS one · 2021Article
- An improved protein structure evaluation using a semi-empirically derived structure property.BMC structural biology · 2018Article
- Uncoiling CNLs: Structure/Function Approaches to Understanding CC Domain Function in Plant NLRs.Plant & cell physiology · 2018Review
- Across-proteome modeling of dimer structures for the bottom-up assembly of protein-protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Great interactions: How binding incorrect partners can teach us about protein recognition and function.Proteins · 2016Article
- Molecular Modeling of Myrosinase from Brassica oleracea: A Structural Investigation of Sinigrin Interaction.Genes · 2015Article
- Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Expanding the conformational selection paradigm in protein-ligand docking.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012Article
- Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: proteins can recognize binding sites of homologous proteins in more than one way.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- GWIDD: Genome-wide protein docking database.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Protinfo PPC: a web server for atomic level prediction of protein complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- SpaK/SpaR two-component system characterized by a structure-driven domain-fusion method and in vitro phosphorylation studies.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructure-based computational methods are needed to help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes and their function. For individual proteins, the most successful technique is homology modelling. We investigate a simple extension of this technique to protein-protein complexes. We consider a large set of complexes of known structures, involving pairs of single-domain proteins. The complexes are compared with each other to establish their sequence and structural similarities and the relation between the two. Compared to earlier studies, a simpler dataset, a simpler structural alignment procedure, and an additional energy criterion are used. Next, we compare the Xray structures to models obtained by threading the native sequence onto other, homologous complexes. An elementary requirement for a successful energy function is to rank the native structure above any threaded structure. We use the DFIREbeta energy function, whose quality and complexity are typical of the models used today. Finally, we compare near-native models to distinctly non-native models.
resultsIf weakly stable complexes are excluded (defined by a binding energy cutoff), as well as a few unusual complexes, a simple homology principle holds: complexes that share more than 35% sequence identity share similar structures and interaction modes; this principle was less clearcut in earlier studies. The energy function was then tested for its ability to identify experimental structures among sets of decoys, produced by a simple threading procedure. On average, the experimental structure is ranked above 92% of the alternate structures. Thus, discrimination of the native structure is good but not perfect. The discrimination of near-native structures is fair. Typically, a single, alternate, non-native binding mode exists that has a native-like energy. Some of the associated failures may correspond to genuine, alternate binding modes and/or native complexes that are artefacts of the crystal environment. In other cases, additional model filtering with more sophisticated tools is needed.
conclusionThe results suggest that the simple modelling procedure applied here could help identify and characterize protein-protein complexes. The next step is to apply it on a genomic scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.