SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological overview of systematic reviews to establish the evidence base for emergency general surgery.The British journal of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).Surgical endoscopy · 2012Guideline
- SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Guideline
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Trial
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of grade of operating surgeon on operative time and 30-day morbidity.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Trial
- Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study.International surgeryTrial
- Improved outcomes for index cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following a dedicated emergency surgery and trauma service (ESAT).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021Article
- Article
- Critical Appraisal of the Impact of the Systematic Adoption of Advanced Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery on the Surgical Management of Mirizzi Syndrome.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Gallstones: new insights into an old story.F1000Research · 2016Review
- PREOP-Gallstones: A Prognostic Nomogram for the Management of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis in Older Patients.Annals of surgery · 2015Article
- The risk paradox: use of elective cholecystectomy in older patients is independent of their risk of developing complications.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2015Article
- Cost-effectiveness of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus observation in older patients presenting with mild biliary disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014Article
- Diagnosis of Gallbladder Perforation-a Puzzle!The Indian journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Prompt laparoscopic cholecystectomy would reduce morbidity and save hospital resources.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2014Article
- Evidence-based treatment of gallstone disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013Article
- World society of emergency surgery study group initiative on Timing of Acute Care Surgery classification (TACS).World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2013Article
- Evidence-based current surgical practice: calculous gallbladder disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012Review
- Response to comment on "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy in situs inversus totalis".Journal of minimal access surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiliary colic is one of the commonest indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves several months of waiting if performed electively. However, patients can develop life-threatening complications during this waiting period.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with biliary colic due to gallstones. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until March 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised clinical trials irrespective of language and publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data. We intended to calculate the risk ratio, risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes using RevMan 4.2 based on intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN
resultsOnly one trial including 75 patients, randomised to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours of diagnosis) (n = 35) and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean waiting period of 4.2 months) (n = 40), qualified for this review. This trial was of high risk of bias. During the waiting period in the delayed group (mean 4.2 months), the complications that the patients suffered included severe acute pancreatitis resulting in mortality (1), empyema of gallbladder (1), gallbladder perforation (1), acute cholecystitis (2), cholangitis (2), obstructive jaundice (2), and recurrent biliary colic requiring hospital visits (5). The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was lower in the early group (0%) than the delayed group (8/40 or 20%) (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant shorter operating time and hospital stay in the early group than the delayed group (WMD -14.80 minutes, 95% CI -18.02 to -11.58 and -1.25 days, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.45 respectively). Fourteen patients (35%) required 18 hospital admissions for symptoms related to gallstones during the mean waiting period of 4.2 months in the delayed group. This is equivalent to 11 admissions per 100 persons per month. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBased on evidence from only one high-bias risk trial, it appears that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (< 24 hours of diagnosis of biliary colic) decreases the morbidity during the waiting period for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, decreases the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, decreases operating time, and decreases hospital stay. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to confirm or refute this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.