Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843723›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Reminder systems and late patient tracers in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis.

Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, Vincent M Balanag, Regina P Berba, Mary Ann D Lansang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. A systematic review on reminder systems in physical therapy.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Qin LiuEffective Healthcare Research Programme Consortium China (Chongqing) RPC Programme , School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, No.1 YixueYuan Road, Chongqing, China, 400016. liuqin81622@163.com
Katharine Abba
Marissa M Alejandria
Vincent M Balanag
Regina P Berba
Mary Ann D Lansang
University of the Philippines System · PHChongqing Medical University · CNLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLung Center of the Philippines · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReminder systems and late patient tracers as strategies to improve patients' adherence to tuberculosis screening, diagnosis, and treatment are used in some countries, but their effectiveness has not previously been systematically reviewed.

objectivesTo assess the effects of reminder systems and late patient tracers on completion of diagnostics, commencement of treatment in people referred for curative or prophylactic treatment of tuberculosis, completion of treatment in people starting curative or prophylactic treatment for tuberculosis, and cure in people being treated for active tuberculosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (June 2008), Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Specialized Register (April 2007), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2008), EMBASE (1974 to June 2008), LILACS (1982 to June 2008), CINAHL (1982 to June 2008), SCI-EXPANDED (1945 to June 2008), SSCI (1956 to June 2008), mRCT (June 2008), Indian Journal of Tuberculosis (1983 to June 2008), and reference lists. We also contacted researchers working in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs, and controlled before-and-after studies comparing any reminders or late patient tracers with no or other kinds of reminders or late patient tracers. We included people in any setting who require treatment for tuberculosis or require prophylaxis against tuberculosis and are referred to tuberculosis diagnostic or screening services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial risk of bias and extracted data. No meta-analysis could be undertaken due to the heterogeneity of interventions across trials. MAIN

resultsNine trials involving 5257 participants met the inclusion criteria. Three assessed the use of late patient tracers, and six assessed reminder systems. Late patient tracers (home visit and letter) were shown to be beneficial in increasing adherence to tuberculosis treatment compared with no late patient tracer. The results from almost all the reminder trials, except one, show benefits of different types of reminders compared to no reminder on adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe included trials show significantly better outcomes among those tuberculosis patients for which late patient tracers and reminders are used. Studies of good quality (large and with rigorous study design) are needed to decide the most effective late patient tracer actions and reminders in different settings. Future studies of reminders in chemoprophylaxis and treatment settings would be useful.

Indexed as

Reminder SystemsAdultChildHumansPatient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID18843723
OpenAlexW1589547079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.