SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Adrenaline (epinephrine) for the treatment of anaphylaxis with and without shock.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of outcome measures in trials of pediatric anaphylaxis treatment.BMC pediatrics · 2014Pooled it
- Adrenaline auto-injectors for the treatment of anaphylaxis with and without cardiovascular collapse in the community.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Glucocorticoids for the treatment of anaphylaxis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- Recombinant human diamine oxidase prevents histamine-induced hypoxia, shock and death in guinea pigs.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Publication Dynamics Where Evidence Is Missing: Mapping Empty Reviews in Nursing.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Article
- Comment on "Ensuring the Efficacy and Safety of Approved Medications ".Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2024Article
- Development ofPharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Adrenaline auto injectors pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and potential consequences for clinical practice.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Review
- Management of Suspected Life-Threatening Perioperative Anaphylaxis and Risk Factors for Near-Fatal and Fatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Study in China.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
- A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- The role of aspirin desensitization followed by oral aspirin therapy in managing patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: A Work Group Report from the Rhinitis, Rhinosinusitis and Ocular Allergy Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Review
- Level of knowledge about anaphylaxis and its management among health care providers.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015Article
- Fish-oil capsule ingestion: a case of recurrent anaphylaxis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012Article
- Does this patient with urticaria/angioedema have anaphylaxis?Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2011Review
- Anaphylaxis in Latin America: a report of the online Latin American survey on anaphylaxis (OLASA).Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2011Article
- Are adrenaline autoinjectors fit for purpose? A pilot study of the mechanical and injection performance characteristics of a cartridge-versus a syringe-based autoinjector.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2010Article
- Fatal anaphylaxis to foods: epidemiology, recognition, and prevention.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2009Review
- Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaphylaxis is a serious hypersensitivity reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause death. Adrenaline is recommended as the initial treatment of choice for anaphylaxis.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of adrenaline (epinephrine) in the treatment of anaphylaxis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2007), EMBASE (1966 to March 2007), CINAHL (1982 to March 2007), BIOSIS (to March 2007), ISI Web of Knowledge (to March 2007) and LILACS (to March 2007). We also searched websites listing ongoing trials: http://clinicaltrials.gov/, http://www.controlledtrials.com and http://www.actr.org.au/; and contacted pharmaceutical companies and international experts in anaphylaxis in an attempt to locate unpublished material. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing adrenaline with no intervention, placebo or other adrenergic agonists were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed articles for inclusion. MAIN
resultsWe found no studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBased on this review, we are unable to make any new recommendations on the use of adrenaline for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Although there is a need for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of high methodological quality in order to define the true extent of benefits from the administration of adrenaline in anaphylaxis, such trials are unlikely to be performed in individuals with anaphylaxis. Indeed, they might be unethical because prompt treatment with adrenaline is deemed to be critically important for survival in anaphylaxis. Also, such studies would be difficult to conduct because anaphylactic episodes usually occur without warning, often in a non-medical setting, and differ in severity both among individuals and from one episode to another in the same individual. Consequently, obtaining baseline measurements and frequent timed measurements might be difficult, or impossible, to obtain. In the absence of appropriate trials, we recommend, albeit on the basis of less than optimal evidence, that adrenaline administration by intramuscular (i.m.) injection should still be regarded as first-line treatment for the management of anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.