Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843691›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care.

Ayub Akbari, Alain Mayhew, Manal Alawi Al-Alawi, Jeremy Grimshaw, Ron Winkens, Elizabeth Glidewell, Chanie Pritchard, Ruth Thomas, Cynthia Fraser

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03473535 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Smartphone-assisted Problem Solving Therapy in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-harm to Emergency Departments in Ontario

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsBEACON + Problem Solving Therapy, Problem-Solving Therapy
NCT03489382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for Cluster RCT of a Service to Deliver Smartphone-Assisted Problem-Solving Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-Harm to the ED in Ontario (Protocol A)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsSmartphone Assisted PST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Guideline
  17. Guideline
  18. Electronic checklists improve referral letters in gastroenterology: a randomized vignette survey.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2018
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ayub AkbariDepartment of Medicine/Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center/University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Riverside Hospitall, 1967 Rverside Drive, Suite 5-25, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 7W9. aakbari@ottawahospital.on.ca
Alain Mayhew
Manal Alawi Al-Alawi
Jeremy Grimshaw
Ron Winkens
Elizabeth Glidewell
Chanie Pritchard
Ruth Thomas
Cynthia Fraser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary care specialist interface is a key organisational feature of many health care systems. Patients are referred to specialist care when investigation or therapeutic options are exhausted in primary care and more specialised care is needed. Referral has considerable implications for patients, the health care system and health care costs. There is considerable evidence that the referral processes can be improved.

objectivesTo estimate the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions to change outpatient referral rates or improve outpatient referral appropriateness. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group specialised register (developed through extensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar and the Cochrane Library) (February 2002) and the National Research Register. Updated searches were conducted in MEDLINE and the EPOC specialised register up to October 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series of interventions to change or improve outpatient referrals. Participants were primary care physicians. The outcomes were objectively measured provider performance or health outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A minimum of two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsSeventeen studies involving 23 separate comparisons were included. Nine studies (14 comparisons) evaluated professional educational interventions. Ineffective strategies included: passive dissemination of local referral guidelines (two studies), feedback of referral rates (one study) and discussion with an independent medical adviser (one study). Generally effective strategies included dissemination of guidelines with structured referral sheets (four out of five studies) and involvement of consultants in educational activities (two out of three studies). Four studies evaluated organisational interventions (patient management by family physicians compared to general internists, attachment of a physiotherapist to general practices, a new slot system for referrals and requiring a second 'in-house' opinion prior to referral), all of which were effective. Four studies (five comparisons) evaluated financial interventions. One study evaluating change from a capitation based to mixed capitation and fee-for-service system and from a fee-for-service to a capitation based system (with an element of risk sharing for secondary care services) observed a reduction in referral rates. Modest reductions in referral rates of uncertain significance were observed following the introduction of the general practice fundholding scheme in the United Kingdom (UK). One study evaluating the effect of providing access to private specialists demonstrated an increase in the proportion of patients referred to specialist services but no overall effect on referral rates. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere are a limited number of rigorous evaluations to base policy on. Active local educational interventions involving secondary care specialists and structured referral sheets are the only interventions shown to impact on referral rates based on current evidence. The effects of 'in-house' second opinion and other intermediate primary care based alternatives to outpatient referral appear promising.

Indexed as

MedicineOutpatientsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareSpecializationControlled Clinical Trials as TopicEconomics, MedicalFamily PracticeHumansInformation DisseminationReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID18843691
PMCPMC4164370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.