SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Once or twice daily versus three times daily amoxicillin with or without clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Once or twice daily versus three times daily amoxicillin with or without clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Antibiotic therapy for children with acute otitis media.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017Review
- Article
- High-dose amoxicillin with clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media in children.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute otitis media (AOM) is a common problem in children, for which the antibiotic amoxicillin, with or without clavulanate, is frequently prescribed.
objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of one or two daily doses with three or four daily doses of amoxicillin, with or without clavulanate, for the treatment of AOM in children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 1), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialized Register; MEDLINE (January 1950 to March 2008); EMBASE (1974 to March 2008); the Science Citation Index (2001 to March 2008); and NLM Gateway (HSRProj) (March 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies if they met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of children aged 12 years or younger with AOM, diagnosed by the following explicit criteria: acute ear pain (otalgia) and inflamed ear drum (confirmed by positive tympanocentesis or tympanogram of type B or C). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on treatment outcomes from individual trials. We assessed quality based on selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias and sample size calculation. The quality grading was defined as low risk of bias, moderate risk of bias or high risk of bias. The results were summarized as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN
resultsWe included six studies with 1601 children in the review. Although the clinical cure rates at the end of therapy and at the follow-up periods of each study were shown to be comparable between the two groups, we did not perform pooled data analysis because of moderate to high risk of biases in the included studies. Most of the children were aged 2 months to 12 years. None of the studies had any consistently significant results either for benefit or harm. The outcomes were assessed at the end of therapy (often 10 days) and this may have been too late to measure any differences. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review showed insufficient evidence to judge whether once or twice daily doses of amoxicillin, with or without clavulanate, were comparable with three or four daily doses for the treatment of AOM. The evidence appears to be biased and therefore no firm conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.