Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843637›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery.

Raymond W J G Ostelo, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Christopher G Maher, Henrica C W de Vet, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. The effectiveness of exercise program after lumbar discectomy surgery.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A descriptive study of the utilization of physical therapy for postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feline physiotherapy and rehabilitation: 1. principles and potential.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Raymond W J G OsteloEMGO Institute - Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences - VU University; VU University Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 BT. r.ostelo@vumc.nl
Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Christopher G Maher
Henrica C W de Vet
Maurits W van Tulder
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLGeorge Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral rehabilitation programs are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery.

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of active rehabilitation for adults after first-time lumbar disc surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO to May 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed with clinically homogeneous studies. The GRADE approach was used to determine the quality of evidence. MAIN

resultsFourteen studies were included, seven of which had a low risk of bias. Most programs were only assessed in one study. Statistical pooling was only completed for three comparisons in which exercises were started four to six weeks post-surgery: exercise programs versus no treatment, high versus low intensity exercise programs, and supervised versus home exercises.There is low quality evidence (three RCTS, N = 156) that exercises are more effective than no treatment for pain at short-term follow-up (WMD -11.13; 95% CI -18.44 to -3.82) and moderate evidence (two RCTs, N = 136) that they are more effective for functional status on short-term follow-up (WMD -6.50; 95% CI -9.26 to -3.74). None of the studies reported that exercises increased the re-operation rate.There is low quality evidence (two RCTs, N =103) that high intensity are slightly more effective than low intensity exercise programs for pain in the short term (WMD -10.67; 95% CI -17.04 to -4.30) and moderate evidence (two RCTs, N = 103) that they are more effective for functional status in the short term (SMD -0.77; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.36).There is low quality evidence (three RCTS, N = 95) that there were no significant differences between supervised and home exercises for short-term pain relief (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.77 to 0.53) or functional status (three RCTs, N = 88; SMD -1.18; 95% CI -2.63 to 0.26). AUTHORS'

conclusionsExercise programs starting four to six weeks post-surgery seem to lead to a faster decrease in pain and disability than no treatment. High intensity exercise programs seem to lead to a faster decrease in pain and disability than low intensity programs. There were no significant differences between supervised and home exercises for pain relief, disability, or global perceived effect. There is no evidence that active programs increase the re-operation rate after first-time lumbar surgery.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyLumbar VertebraeHumansIntervertebral DiscPostoperative PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID18843637
OpenAlexW4246610755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.