Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843483›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2009

Cognitive effects of psychotomimetic drugs in rats discriminating number cues.

C B Willmore, D M Krall, F M Spears, A Makriyannis, G I Elmer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C B WillmoreRaabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH 45810, USA. cwillmor@harding.edu
D M Krall
F M Spears
A Makriyannis
G I Elmer
Ohio Northern University · USHarding University Main Campus · USMaryland Medical Research Institute · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Cannabinergic Medications for Methamphetamine AddictionR37DA023142 · NIDA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MAKRIYANNIS, ALEXANDROS · 2007 to 2016
$7.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA023142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDeficits in memory and attention are broadly acknowledged during psychosis; however, experiments on modeled psychosis often test working memory without systematic manipulation of attentional demands.

objectivesThe major research goal was discovering which neurobehavioral processes, attention, or memory contributed more to drug-provoked performance deficits. MATERIALS AND

methodsRats were trained to perform operant ratio discrimination (RD) tasks wherein the number of presses at a rear-wall lever was discriminated using one of two front-wall levers. Effects from four psychotomimetic drugs, the serotonin agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine, the noncompetitive NMDA-glutamate receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP), and two CB1-selective cannabinoid agonists, WIN 55,512-2 and AM 411, were assessed using a signal detection analytical overlay to dissociate cognitive from noncognitive motor and motivational disruptions. Further methods allowed dissociation of attention compromises from mnemonic deficits.

resultsFor each test compound, at least one dose elicited decreased RD accuracy without affecting response rates, and task difficulty was shown to be a crucial dictator of accuracy effect specificities. Effects from both PCP and WIN 55,512-2 biased animals to select the response lever conditioned for denser reinforcement. The same two drugs rendered peculiar response patterns in distracter light session components, considering light blinks were included to divert subjects' attention away from task-relevant information. The response patterns determined during distracter components of PCP/WIN testing sessions, counterintuitively, suggest performance enhancement.

conclusionComprehensive viewing of RD performance patterns after drug administration indicates that sustained attention and transient information management are significantly impaired during the drug-induced psychosis state, while selective attention is less affected.

Indexed as

AdamantaneAmphetaminesAnimalsAttentionCognitionDiscrimination LearningDronabinolExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsMalePhencyclidineRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReinforcement, PsychologySerotonin Receptor Agonists4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamineAdamantane(-)-adamantyl-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinolAmphetaminesDronabinolExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsPhencyclidineReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerotonin Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID18843483
PMCPMC5531750
OpenAlexW2062357258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.