Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843467›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2009

[Pre-hospital emergency sonography of trauma patients].

T Kirschning, F Brenner, M Stier, C F Weber, F Walcher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Echoscopy in scanning abdominal diseases in a critical care setting.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  2. Prehospital point-of-care emergency ultrasound: a cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Examination concepts and procedures in emergency ultrasonography].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T KirschningKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt a.M., Deutschland. thomas.kirschning@t-online.de
F Brenner
M Stier
C F Weber
F Walcher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides severe cerebral trauma, abdominal bleeding is the most frequent cause of death after multiple trauma. Abdominal bleeding is difficult to diagnose because initially at the scene a multiply injured patient with a stable circulation is often encountered. Ultrasound diagnostics have played a central role in the diagnostics of emergency patients for many years. This technique is used both in the emergency room and in the intensive care unit, in the operation center and to an increasing extent in emergency diagnostics during the pre-hospital setting. The following article deals with the ultrasound investigation of injured patients, the indications and examination technique are described, as well as the specific characteristics of using ultrasound at the scene. Finally, device-specific characteristics and the state of development in Germany are presented.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAbdominal InjuriesGermanyHumansMultiple TraumaShockUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.