Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18843021›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2008

HSD17B1 genetic variants and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer.

Mia M Gaudet, Stephen Chanock, Alison Dunning, Kristy Driver, Louise A Brinton, Jolanta Lissowska, Beata Peplonska, Paul Pharoah, Montserrat Garcia-Closas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The 6q22.33 locus and breast cancer susceptibility.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2009
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mia M GaudetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. gaudetm@mskcc.org
Stephen Chanock
Alison Dunning
Kristy Driver
Louise A Brinton
Jolanta Lissowska
Beata Peplonska
Paul Pharoah
Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USCancer Research UK · GBDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Institute · USNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine · PLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
Cancer Research UKIntramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HSD17B1 is an important candidate gene in breast cancer via its role in converting estrone to estradiol. A nonsynonymous G-to-A transition (rs605059) and an intronic C-to-A (rs676387) single-nucleotide polymorphism, which captured most common variation in HSD17B1, were evaluated in several breast cancer studies with inconclusive results. We followed up these findings in the Polish Breast Cancer Study (1,995 cases; 2,296 controls) and the British Studies of Epidemiology and Risk Factors in Cancer Heredity study (4,470 cases; 4,560 controls). Meta-analyses of published data and our own were also conducted among Caucasian women. Consistent with previous reports, we found little to no association with overall risk for heterozygotes and minor allele homozygotes compared with major allele homozygotes for rs605059 [summary odds ratios (95% confidence intervals), 0.93 (0.87-0.99) for GA and 0.96 (0.85-1.08), based on 11,762 cases and 14,329 controls from 10 studies] and for rs676387 [summary odds ratios (95% confidence intervals), 1.04 (0.97-1.12) and 1.12 (0.99-1.27), based on analyses of 11,074 cases and 13,605 controls from 8 studies]. Data from the Polish [n=586 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) cases] and British (n=407) studies did not support the previous findings that ER- tumors were inversely associated with rs676387 AA genotype and positively associated with rs605059 GG genotype, based on subanalyses in 5 prospective cohorts with 354 ER- cases. In conclusion, it is unlikely that common genetic variation in HSD17B1 is associated with a moderate modulation in breast cancer risk overall; however, we cannot exclude the possibility of a very weak effect. Associations between HSD17B1 genotypes and risk for ER- breast cancer were inconsistent across studies and should be studied further.

Indexed as

Genetic Variation17-Hydroxysteroid DehydrogenasesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHaplotypesHumansLogistic ModelsPolandPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited Kingdom17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases

Identifiers

PMID18843021
PMCPMC2908717
OpenAlexW2170715430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.