Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18841259›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2008

Cardiac involvement in Becker muscular dystrophy.

Josef Finsterer, Claudia Stöllberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Respiratory function in Becker muscular dystrophy: a comprehensive longitudinal study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Muscular Dystrophies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josef FinstererKrankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria. fifigs1@yahoo.de
Claudia Stöllberger
Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review gives an overview of the clinical and subclinical manifestations of cardiac involvement (CI) in Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), its pathophysiological background, diagnostic possibilities and therapeutic options for CI in BMD patients and carriers. CI may be subclinical or symptomatic. Up to 100% of patients develop subclinical CI. The onset of symptomatic CI is usually in the third decade of life, rarely in the first decade. One-third of patients develop dilative cardiomyopathy with concomitant heart failure. In BMD patients, CI manifests as electrocardiographic abnormalities, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilation of the cardiac cavities with preserved systolic function, dilative cardiomyopathy or cardiac arrest. There is no correlation between CI and the severity of myopathy. CI is more prominent in patients than carriers. As soon as the diagnosis of BMD is established, a comprehensive cardiac examination should be performed. Because CI in BMD is progressive and adequate therapy is available, cardiac investigations need to be regularly repeated. If CI in BMD is recognized early, appropriate therapy may be applied early, resulting in a more favourable outcome.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesDiagnosis, DifferentialEchocardiographyHumansIncidenceMuscular Dystrophy, DuchennePrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18841259
PMCPMC2643160
OpenAlexW1968326278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.