ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991
Blockade by the local anaesthetic, tetracaine, of desensitization of Ca-induced Ca release after muscarinic stimulation in smooth muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of the binding of [3H]-mepyramine to intact human U373 MG astrocytoma cells: evidence for histamine-induced H1-receptor internalisation.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Novel regulation of muscarinic receptors and their coupling with G proteins in smooth muscle: transient resensitization during desensitizing process.British journal of pharmacology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Desensitization of contractile responses dependent on release of intracellularly stored Ca elicited by carbachol, histamine or caffeine was measured after desensitizing treatment with carbachol or histamine in the presence or absence of local anaesthetics in Ca-free solution containing 2 mM EGTA in the smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia caecum. 2. Histamine-induced homologous desensitization was inhibited by tetracaine and procainamide. Dibucaine did not exert an inhibitory effect on the desensitization. This is consistent with our previous findings concerning the effects of local anaesthetics on the desensitization of histamine H1-receptors measured under normal physiological conditions. 3. Carbachol induced a functional change of intracellular Ca stores which resulted in heterologous desensitization. Tetracaine completely blocked carbachol-induced desensitization of the caffeine-elicited contraction, but in the case of carbachol-induced desensitization of carbachol- and histamine-elicited contractions, this blocking effect of tetracaine was very weak and absent, respectively. The other local anaesthetics used did not affect the desensitization. These results suggest that the Ca-induced and inositol trisphosphate-induced Ca release mechanisms were both desensitized by carbachol and that the desensitization of the Ca-induced Ca release mechanism was selectively blocked by tetracaine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.